The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The earliest archaeological maize ( Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: New accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications
Open accessAbstract
Accelerator mass spectrometry age determinations of maize cobs ( Zea mays L.) from Guilá Naquitz Cave in Oaxaca, Mexico, produced dates of 5,400 carbon-14 years before the present (about 6,250 calendar years ago), making those cobs the oldest in the Americas. Macrofossils and phytoliths characteristic of wild and domesticated Zea fruits are absent from older strata from the site, although Zea pollen has previously been identified from those levels. These results, together with the modern geographical distribution of wild Zea mays, suggest that the cultural practices that led to Zea domestication probably occurred elsewhere in Mexico. Guilá Naquitz Cave has now yielded the earliest macrofossil evidence for the domestication of two major American crop plants, squash ( Cucurbita pepo ) and maize.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
The Initial Domestication of Cucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 Years Ago
Smith, B. D. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5314.932 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Genetic analyses from ancient DNA
Pääbo, S., Poinar, H., Serre, D., Jaenicke-Després, V., Hebler, J., Rohland, N., Kuch, M., Krause, J., Vigilant, L., & Hofreiter, M. (2004) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214 · Cited by 1,333
Genetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
The origins of food production in north China: A different kind of agricultural revolution
Bettinger, R. L., Barton, L., & Morgan, C. (2010) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20236 · Cited by 174
Slash-burn-and-churn: Landscape history and crop cultivation in pre-Columbian Amazonia
Arroyo-Kalin, M. (2012) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2011.08.004 · Cited by 115
Palaeontological evidence for defining the Anthropocene
Barnosky, A. D. (2014) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/sp395.6 · Cited by 72
Washburn, J. D., Burch, M. B., & Franco, J. A. V. (2020) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20052 · Cited by 65
Ecological legacies of past fire and human activity in a Panamanian forest
McMichael, C. N. H., Vink, V., Heijink, B. M., Witteveen, N. H., Piperno, D. R., Gosling, W. D., & Bush, M. B. (2023) · PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10344 · Cited by 14
Self-citationAllende, M. K.-G., & Samplonius, A. (2022) · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151849 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Piperno, D. R., & Flannery, K. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-02-13
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2101-2103
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2148919594
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.