Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Caveolin Isoforms Differ in Their N-terminal Protein Sequence and Subcellular Distribution. IDENTIFICATION AND EPITOPE MAPPING OF AN ISOFORM-SPECIFIC MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY PROBE

Open access
Scherer, Philipp E., Tang, ZhaoLan, Chun, Miyoung, Sargiacomo, Massimo, Lodish, Harvey F., Lisanti, Michael P.·1995·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Caveolin, an integral membrane protein, is a principal component of caveolae membranes in vivo. Two isoforms of caveolin have been identified: a slower migrating 24-kDa species (alpha-isoform) and a faster migrating 21-kDa species (beta-isoform). Little is known about how these isoforms differ, either structurally or functionally. Here we have begun to study the differences between these two isoforms. Microsequencing of caveolin reveals that both isoforms contain internal caveolin residues 47-77. In a second independent approach, we recombinantly expressed caveolin in a caveolin-negative cell line (FRT cells). Stable transfection of FRT cells with the full-length caveolin cDNA resulted in the expression of both caveolin isoforms, indicating that they can be derived from a single cDNA. Using extracts from caveolin-expressing FRT cells, we fortuitously identified a monoclonal antibody that recognizes only the alpha-isoform of caveolin. Epitope mapping of this monoclonal antibody reveals that it recognizes an epitope within the extreme N terminus of caveolin, specifically residues 1-21. These results suggest that alpha- and beta-isoforms of caveolin differ in their N-terminal protein sequences. To independently evaluate this possibility, we placed an epitope tag at either the extreme N or C terminus of full-length caveolin. Results of these "tagging" experiments clearly demonstrate that (i) both isoforms of caveolin contain a complete C terminus and (ii) that the alpha-isoform contains a complete N terminus while the beta-isoform lacks N-terminal-specific protein sequences. Mutational analysis reveals that these two isoforms apparently derive from the use of two alternate start sites: methionine at position 1 and an internal methionine at position 32. This would explain the approximately 3-kDa difference in their apparent migration in SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels. In addition, using isoform-specific antibody probes we show that caveolin isoforms may assume a distinct but overlapping subcellular distribution by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. We discuss the possible implications of these differences between alpha- and beta-caveolin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.270.27.16395

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Chun, M., Sargiacomo, M., Lodish, H. F., & Lisanti, M. P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
270
Issue
27
Pages
16395-16401
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015661133
Cited by
355
References
0
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Caveolin Isoforms Differ in Their N-terminal Protein Sequence and Subcellular Distribution. IDENTIFICATION AND EPITOPE MAPPING OF AN ISOFORM-SPECIFIC MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY PROBE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.270.27.16395
The paper
Scherer, P. E., Tang, Z., Chun, M., Sargiacomo, M., Lodish, H. F., & Lisanti, M. P. (1995). Caveolin Isoforms Differ in Their N-terminal Protein Sequence and Subcellular Distribution. IDENTIFICATION AND EPITOPE MAPPING OF AN ISOFORM-SPECIFIC MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY PROBE. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.27.16395

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.