Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,044

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

G Protein-coupled Receptors

Open access
Lefkowitz, Robert J.·1998·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Of the many forms of GPCR 1The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; βARK, β-adrenergic receptor kinase; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase. 1The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; βARK, β-adrenergic receptor kinase; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase. regulation none has received as much attention as the process of receptor desensitization,i.e. the waning responsiveness of the receptors in the face of persistent stimulation (1Hausdorff W.P. Caron M.G. Lefkowitz R.J. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2881-2889Crossref PubMed Scopus (1082) Google Scholar, 2Ferguson S.S.G. Barak L.S. Zhang J. Caron M.G. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1996; 74: 1095-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (318) Google Scholar). Numerous mechanisms have been discovered, including those that operate at the transcriptional, translational, and protein levels. The latter category in turn includes mechanisms that regulate the rate of degradation of the receptors. Finally, there are mechanisms for the covalent modification of the receptors as well as for the regulation of their association with other proteins and their subcellular localization (1Hausdorff W.P. Caron M.G. Lefkowitz R.J. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2881-2889Crossref PubMed Scopus (1082) Google Scholar, 2Ferguson S.S.G. Barak L.S. Zhang J. Caron M.G. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1996; 74: 1095-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (318) Google Scholar, 3Koenig J.A. Edwardson J.M. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1997; 18: 176-287Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (330) Google Scholar). This brief review is concerned with this last group of mechanisms, which appears to be most important with respect to the rapid (seconds–minutes as opposed to hours or days) control of receptor function.Traditionally, receptor desensitization has been viewed as a process antithetical to receptor activation, one which terminates or attenuates receptor signaling. Three families of regulatory molecules have been found to participate in desensitization of heptahelical receptors: second messenger-regulated kinases (e.g. PKA and PKC), GRKs (e.g. βARK, rhodopsin kinase), and the arrestins (visual and non-visual). After briefly reviewing the well established paradigms for regulation of GPCRs by these three families of molecules, I will attempt to demonstrate how newly acquired insights into the function of these receptor regulatory molecules are reshaping understanding of the classical dichotomy between receptor activation and desensitization. The new information suggests that receptor signaling and desensitization are in reality two intimately linked aspects of receptor function and that mechanisms previously viewed as “desensitizing” with respect to one signaling pathway may be “activating” with respect to another. Of the many forms of GPCR 1The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; βARK, β-adrenergic receptor kinase; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase. 1The abbreviations used are: GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; βARK, β-adrenergic receptor kinase; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; MAP kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase. regulation none has received as much attention as the process of receptor desensitization,i.e. the waning responsiveness of the receptors in the face of persistent stimulation (1Hausdorff W.P. Caron M.G. Lefkowitz R.J. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2881-2889Crossref PubMed Scopus (1082) Google Scholar, 2Ferguson S.S.G. Barak L.S. Zhang J. Caron M.G. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1996; 74: 1095-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (318) Google Scholar). Numerous mechanisms have been discovered, including those that operate at the transcriptional, translational, and protein levels. The latter category in turn includes mechanisms that regulate the rate of degradation of the receptors. Finally, there are mechanisms for the covalent modification of the receptors as well as for the regulation of their association with other proteins and their subcellular localization (1Hausdorff W.P. Caron M.G. Lefkowitz R.J. FASEB J. 1990; 4: 2881-2889Crossref PubMed Scopus (1082) Google Scholar, 2Ferguson S.S.G. Barak L.S. Zhang J. Caron M.G. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1996; 74: 1095-1110Crossref PubMed Scopus (318) Google Scholar, 3Koenig J.A. Edwardson J.M. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1997; 18: 176-287Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (330) Google Scholar). This brief review is concerned with this last group of mechanisms, which appears to be most important with respect to the rapid (seconds–minutes as opposed to hours or days) control of receptor function. Traditionally, receptor desen

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.273.30.18677

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,044

Metadata

Authors
Lefkowitz, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-07
Volume
273
Issue
30
Pages
18677-18680
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980445909
Cited by
1,044
References
1
FWCI
35.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: G Protein-coupled Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.273.30.18677
The paper
Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998). G Protein-coupled Receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.30.18677

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.