CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sonic Hedgehog-induced Activation of the Gli1Promoter Is Mediated by GLI3

Dai, Ping, Akimaru, Hiroshi, Tanaka, Yasunori, Maekawa, Toshio, Nakafuku, Masato, Ishii, Shunsuke·1999·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8143
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Drosophila transcription factor cubitus interruptus (Ci) and its co-activator CRE (cAMP response element)-binding protein (CBP) activate a group of target genes on the anterior-posterior border in response to hedgehog protein (Hh) signaling. In the anterior region, in contrast, the carboxyl-truncated form of Ci generated by protein processing represses Hh expression. In vertebrates, three Ci-related transcription factors (glioblastoma gene products (GLIs) 1, 2, and 3) were identified, but their functional difference in Hh signal transduction is unknown. Here, we report distinct roles for GLI1 and GLI3 in Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling. GLI3 containing both repression and activation domains acts both as an activator and a repressor, as does Ci, whereas GLI1 contains only the activation domain. Consistent with this, GLI3, but not GLI1, is processed to generate the repressor form. Transcriptional co-activator CBP binds to GLI3, but not to GLI1. The trans-activating capacity of GLI3 is positively and negatively regulated by Shh and cAMP-dependent protein kinase, respectively, through a specific region of GLI3, which contains the CBP-binding domain and the phosphorylation sites of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. GLI3 directly binds to the Gli1 promoter and induces Gli1 transcription in response to Shh. Thus, GLI3 may act as a mediator of Shh signaling in the activation of the target gene Gli1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8143

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Ingham, 1995, EMBO J., 17, 3505, 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3505 · DOI
  2. Ruiz i Altaba, 1997, Cell, 90, 193, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80325-6 · DOI
  3. Herberline, 1993, Cell, 75, 913, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90535-X · DOI
  4. Ma, 1993, Cell, 75, 927, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90536-Y · DOI
  5. Basler, 1994, Nature, 368, 208, 10.1038/368208a0 · DOI
  6. Tabata, 1994, Cell, 76, 89, 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90175-9 · DOI
  7. von Ohlen, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 2404, 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2404 · DOI
  8. Orenic, 1990, Genes Dev., 4, 1053, 10.1101/gad.4.6.1053 · DOI
  9. Alexandre, 1996, Genes Dev., 10, 2003, 10.1101/gad.10.16.2003 · DOI
  10. Aza-Balnc, 1997, Cell, 89, 1043, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80292-5 · DOI
  11. Domı́guez, 1996, Science, 272, 1621, 10.1126/science.272.5268.1621 · DOI
  12. Alcedo, 1996, Cell, 86, 221, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80094-X · DOI
  13. Chen, 1996, Cell, 87, 553, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81374-4 · DOI
  14. Marigo, 1996, Nature, 384, 176, 10.1038/384176a0 · DOI
  15. Stone, 1996, Nature, 384, 129, 10.1038/384129a0 · DOI
  16. Préat, 1990, Nature, 347, 87, 10.1038/347087a0 · DOI
  17. Robbins, 1997, Cell, 90, 225, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80331-1 · DOI
  18. Sisson, 1997, Cell, 90, 235, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80332-3 · DOI
  19. Jiang, 1995, Cell, 80, 563, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90510-3 · DOI
  20. Lepage, 1995, Nature, 373, 711, 10.1038/373711a0 · DOI
  21. Li, 1995, Cell, 80, 553, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90509-X · DOI
  22. Pan, 1995, Cell, 80, 543, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90508-1 · DOI
  23. Strutt, 1995, Nature, 373, 705, 10.1038/373705a0 · DOI
  24. Monnier, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, 583, 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70227-1 · DOI
  25. Chiang, 1996, Nature, 383, 407, 10.1038/383407a0 · DOI
  26. Hammerschmidt, 1996, Genes Dev., 10, 647, 10.1101/gad.10.6.647 · DOI
  27. Epstein, 1996, Development, 122, 2885, 10.1242/dev.122.9.2885 · DOI
  28. Kinzler, 1987, Science, 236, 70, 10.1126/science.3563490 · DOI
  29. Ruppert, 1988, Mol. Cell. Biol., 8, 3104
  30. Kinzler, 1988, Nature, 332, 371, 10.1038/332371a0 · DOI
  31. Kinzler, 1990, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 634
  32. Marigo, 1996, Dev. Biol., 180, 273, 10.1006/dbio.1996.0300 · DOI
  33. Lee, 1997, Development, 124, 2537, 10.1242/dev.124.13.2537 · DOI
  34. Hynes, 1997, Neuron, 19, 15, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80344-X · DOI
  35. Platt, 1997, Mech. Dev., 62, 121, 10.1016/S0925-4773(96)00648-X · DOI
  36. Büscher, 1997, Mech. Dev., 62, 175, 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00656-4 · DOI
  37. Sasaki, 1997, Development, 124, 1313, 10.1242/dev.124.7.1313 · DOI
  38. Marine, 1997, Mech. Dev., 63, 211, 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00050-6 · DOI
  39. Vortkamp, 1991, Nature, 352, 539, 10.1038/352539a0 · DOI
  40. Kang, 1997, Nat. Genet., 15, 266, 10.1038/ng0397-266 · DOI
  41. Hui, 1993, Nat. Genet., 3, 241, 10.1038/ng0393-241 · DOI
  42. Hennekam, 1990, Am J. Med. Genet., 6 (suppl.), 17
  43. Tanaka, 1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 94, 10215, 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10215 · DOI
  44. Giles, 1998, Trends Genet., 14, 178, 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01438-3 · DOI
  45. Akimaru, 1997, Nature, 386, 735, 10.1038/386735a0 · DOI
  46. Laimins, 1984, J. Virol., 49, 183, 10.1128/jvi.49.1.183-189.1984 · DOI
  47. Takebe, 1988, Mol. Cell. Biol., 8, 466
  48. Dai, 1996, Genes Dev., 10, 528, 10.1101/gad.10.5.528 · DOI
  49. Bannister, 1995, Oncogene, 11, 2509
  50. Nakagawa, 1996, Development, 122, 2449, 10.1242/dev.122.8.2449 · DOI
  51. Hui, 1994, Dev. Biol., 162, 402, 10.1006/dbio.1994.1097 · DOI
  52. Chen, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 2349, 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2349 · DOI
  53. Ohlmeyer, 1997, Genes Dev., 11, 2250, 10.1101/gad.11.17.2250 · DOI
  54. Motzny, 1995, Mech. Dev., 52, 137, 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00397-J · DOI
  55. Mo, 1997, Development, 124, 113, 10.1242/dev.124.1.113 · DOI
  56. Matise, 1998, Development, 125, 2759, 10.1242/dev.125.15.2759 · DOI
  57. Ruiz i Altaba, 1998, Development, 125, 2203, 10.1242/dev.125.12.2203 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Vortkamp, 1995, Hum. Genet., 95, 82, 10.1007/BF00225080 · DOI
  59. Masuya, 1995, Genes Dev., 9, 1645, 10.1101/gad.9.13.1645 · DOI
  60. Akimaru, 1997, Nat. Genet., 17, 211, 10.1038/ng1097-211 · DOI
  61. Howard, 1997, Nat. Genet., 15, 36, 10.1038/ng0197-36 · DOI
  62. El Ghouzzi, 1997, Nat. Genet., 15, 42, 10.1038/ng0197-42 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dai, P., Akimaru, H., Tanaka, Y., Maekawa, T., Nakafuku, M., & Ishii, S.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
274
Issue
12
Pages
8143-8152
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.274.12.8143
Cited by
466
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review