Cited by 52Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsProteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans researchOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Mutations in the Interglobular Domain of Aggrecan Alter Matrix Metalloproteinase and Aggrecanase Cleavage Patterns

Open access
Mercuri, Francesca A., Maciewicz, Rose A., Tart, Jonathan, Last, Karena, Fosang, Amanda J.·2000·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

We have expressed G1-G2 mutants with amino acid changes at the DIPEN(341) downward arrow(342)FFGVG and ITEGE(373) downward arrow(374)ARGSV cleavage sites, in order to investigate the relationship between matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and aggrecanase activities in the interglobular domain (IGD) of aggrecan. The mutation DIPEN(341) to DIGSA(341) partially blocked cleavage by MMP-13 and MMP-8 at the MMP site, while the mutation (342)FFGVG to (342)GTRVG completely blocked cleavage at this site by MMP-1, -2, -3, -7, -8, -9, -13, -14. Each of the MMP cleavage site mutants, including a four-amino acid deletion mutant lacking residues ENFF(343), were efficiently cleaved by aggrecanase, suggesting that the primary sequence at the MMP site had no effect on aggrecanase activity in the IGD. The mutation (374)ARGSV to (374)NVYSV completely blocked cleavage at the aggrecanase site by aggrecanase, MMP-8 and atrolysin C but had no effect on the ability of MMP-8 and MMP-13 to cleave at the Asn(341) downward arrowPhe bond. Susceptibility to atrolysin C cleavage at the MMP site was conferred in the DIGSA(341) mutant but absent in the wild-type, (342)GTRVG, (374)NVYSV, and deletion mutants. To further explore the relationship between MMP and aggrecanase activities, sequential digest experiments were done in which MMP degradation products were subsequently digested with aggrecanase and vice versa. Aggrecanase-derived G1 domains with ITEGE(373) C termini were viable substrates for MMPs; however, MMP-derived G2 fragments were resistant to cleavage by aggrecanase. A 10-mer peptide FVDIPENFFG, which is a substrate analogue for the MMP cleavage site, inhibited aggrecanase cleavage at the Glu(373) downward arrowAla bond. This study demonstrates that MMPs and aggrecanase have unique substrate recognition in the IGD of aggrecan and suggests that sequences at the C terminus of the DIPEN(341) G1 domain may be important for regulating aggrecanase cleavage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.275.42.33038

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggrecan has been previously identified as an MMP-9 target.

    “As aggrecan has been previously identified as an MMP-9 target (Mercuri et al., 2000; Madsen et al., 2010; Rankin-Gee et al., 2015), aggrecan-rich PNNs may be unstable in the presence of MMP-9, leading to abnormal development and neural excitability (Murase et al., 2017; Wen et al., 2017).”
  • The increase in perisynaptic MMP activity induced by salient experience is associated with a specific class of synapse (thalamic inputs to cortex), and a decrease in aggrecan.

    “In addition, we show that the increase in perisynaptic MMP activity induced by salient experience is associated with a specific class of synapse (thalamic inputs to cortex), and a decrease in aggrecan, a known MMP-9 substrate (Mercuri et al., 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mercuri, F. A., Maciewicz, R. A., Tart, J., Last, K., & Fosang, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Fosang, Amanda J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
275
Issue
42
Pages
33038-33045
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127183158
Cited by
52
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Keywords
interglobular domain, matrix metalloproteinases, aggrecanase, substrate specificity, MMP-13, MMP-8, substrate analogues, proteolytic cleavage, proteoglycan degradation, cartilage proteolysis, chondroitin sulfate
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Enzyme Precursors, Humans, Metalloendopeptidases, Molecular Sequence Data, Endopeptidases, Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans, Proteoglycans, Recombinant Proteins, Substrate Specificity, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, Extracellular Matrix Proteins, Collagenases, DNA Primers, Gelatinases, Spodoptera, Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1, Matrix Metalloproteinase 9, Matrix Metalloproteinase 1, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Lectins, C-Type, Aggrecans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review