Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalytic Activity Is Not Required for Secreted PCSK9 to Reduce Low Density Lipoprotein Receptors in HepG2 Cells

McNutt, Markey C., Lagace, Thomas A., Horton, Jay D.·2007·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.c700095200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The post-ER mechanism of PCSK9-mediated LDLr disposal requires the proteolytic activity of PCSK9.

    “The post-ER mechanism requires the proteolytic activity of PCSK9, whereas the endosomallysosomal mechanism does not (Park et al, 2004;McNutt et al, 2007).”

    From PCSK9 is required for the disposal of non-acetylated intermediates of the nascent membrane protein BACE1 (2008) · cites this paper as McNutt et al, 2007

    The Discussion (page not provided) describes intracellular LDLR degradation in a post-ER compartment, but says only that the study does not preclude the possibility that this pathway requires PCSK9 catalytic activity. It does not establish that proteolytic activity is required for the post-ER mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mutation of one residue of the PCSK9 catalytic triad abolishes its proteolytic activity and its ability to undergo processing to the C-form.

    “Mutation of one of these residues abolishes the proteolytic activity of PCSK9 and its ability to undergo processing to the C-form (Benjannet et al, 2004(Benjannet et al, , 2006;;McNutt et al, 2007).”
  • The proteolytic activity of PCSK9 requires a catalytic triad of Asp186, His226, and Ser386.

    “The proteolytic activity of PCSK9 requires a triad of residues (Asp 186, His 226 and Ser 386), which constitute the 'catalytic triad' of the protease.”
  • The endosomal-lysosomal mechanism of PCSK9-mediated LDLr disposal does not require the proteolytic activity of PCSK9.

    “The post-ER mechanism requires the proteolytic activity of PCSK9, whereas the endosomallysosomal mechanism does not (Park et al, 2004;McNutt et al, 2007).”
  • PCSK9 is highly expressed in the liver and, upon secretion into plasma, binds to and enhances the degradation of LDLR in a nonenzymatic fashion, thereby increasing circulating LDL cholesterol.

    “The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is highly expressed in the liver (2) and, upon its secretion into plasma, binds to and enhances the degradation of the LDLR in a nonenzymatic fashion (3, 4, 5, 6), thereby increasing circulating LDLc.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Seidah, 2007, J. Mol. Med.
  2. Seidah, 1997, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 8, 602, 10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80036-5 · DOI
  3. Seidah, 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 100, 928, 10.1073/pnas.0335507100 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benjannet, 1993, Biochem. J., 294, 735, 10.1042/bj2940735 · DOI
  5. Molloy, 1994, EMBO J., 13, 18, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06231.x · DOI
  6. Nakayama, 1997, Biochem. J., 327, 625, 10.1042/bj3270625 · DOI
  7. Cheng, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 22805, 10.1074/jbc.274.32.22805 · DOI
  8. Naureckiene, 2003, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 420, 55, 10.1016/j.abb.2003.09.011 · DOI
  9. Benjannet, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 48865, 10.1074/jbc.M409699200 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Baker, 1993, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 5, 966, 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90078-5 · DOI
  11. Anderson, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 12879, 10.1074/jbc.M108740200 · DOI
  12. Seidah, 2006, Biol. Chem., 387, 871, 10.1515/BC.2006.110 · DOI
  13. Lagace, 2006, J. Clin. Investig., 116, 2995, 10.1172/JCI29383 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cunningham, 2007, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 14, 413, 10.1038/nsmb1235 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Abifadel, 2003, Nat. Genet., 34, 154, 10.1038/ng1161 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Maxwell, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 7100, 10.1073/pnas.0402133101 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Park, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 50630, 10.1074/jbc.M410077200 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Rashid, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 5374, 10.1073/pnas.0501652102 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cameron, 2006, Hum. Mol. Genet., 15, 1551, 10.1093/hmg/ddl077 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Zhang, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 18602, 10.1074/jbc.M702027200 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Reeves, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 11487, 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11487 · DOI
  22. Zhao, 2006, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 79, 514, 10.1086/507488 · DOI
  23. Maxwell, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 2069, 10.1073/pnas.0409736102 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Nassoury, 2007, Traffic, 8, 718, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00562.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McNutt, M. C., Lagace, T. A., & Horton, J. D.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
282
Issue
29
Pages
20799-20803
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
251
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review