The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cloning of Two Human Thyroid cDNAs Encoding New Members of the NADPH Oxidase Family
Open accessAbstract
Two cDNAs encoding NADPH oxidases and constituting the thyroid H(2)O(2) generating system have been cloned. The strategy of cloning was based on the functional similarities between H(2)O(2) generation in leukocytes and the thyroid, according to the hypothesis that one of the components of the thyroid system would belong to the gp91(Phox)/Mox1 gene family and display sequence similarities with gp91(Phox). Screening at low stringency with a gp91(Phox) probe of cDNA libraries from thyroid cells in primary culture yielded two distinct human cDNA clones harboring open reading frames of 1551 (ThOX1) and 1548 amino acids (ThOX2), respectively. The encoded polypeptides display 83% sequence similarity and are clearly related to gp91(Phox) (53 and 47% similarity). The theoretical molecular mass of 177 kDa is close to the apparent molecular mass of 180 kDa of the native corresponding porcine flavoprotein and the protein(s) detected by Western blot in dog and human thyroid. ThOX1 and ThOX2 display sequence similarities of 53% and 61%, respectively, with a predicted protein of Caenorhabditis elegans over their entire length. They show along their first 500 amino acids a similarity of 43% with thyroperoxidase. The corresponding genes of ThOX1 and ThOX2 are closely linked on chromosome 15q15.3. The dog mRNA expression is thyroid-specific and up-regulated by agents activating the cAMP pathway as is the synthesis of the polypeptides they are coding for. In human thyroid the positive regulation by cAMP is less pronounced. The proteins ThOX1 and ThOX2 accumulate at the apical membrane of thyrocytes and are co-localized with thyroperoxidase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology
Bedard, K., & Krause, K.-H. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00044.2005 · Cited by 6,989
NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen
Lambeth, J. D. (2004) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1312 · Cited by 3,125
Myeloperoxidase: friend and foe
Klebanoff, S. J. (2005) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.1204697 · Cited by 2,282
Reactive oxygen species: from health to disease
Brieger, K., Schiavone, S., Miller Jr., F. J., & Krause, K.-H. (2012) · Swiss Medical Weekly · doi:10.4414/smw.2012.13659 · Cited by 1,133
NADPH oxidases: An overview from structure to innate immunity-associated pathologies
Panday, A., Sahoo, M. K., Osorio, D., & Batra, S. (2015) · Cellular & Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/cmi.2014.89 · Cited by 944
Metadata
- Authors
- De Deken, X., Wang, D., Many, M.-C., Costagliola, S., Libert, F., Vassart, G., Dumont, J. E., & Miot, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 23227-23233
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155083127
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloning of Two Human Thyroid cDNAs Encoding New Members of the NADPH Oxidase Family. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m000916200
- The paper
- De Deken, X., Wang, D., Many, M.-C., Costagliola, S., Libert, F., Vassart, G., Dumont, J. E., & Miot, F. (2000). Cloning of Two Human Thyroid cDNAs Encoding New Members of the NADPH Oxidase Family. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m000916200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.