The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence for Simultaneous Protein Interactions between Human Rad51 Paralogs
Open accessAbstract
In yeast, the Rad51-related proteins include Rad55 and Rad57, which form a heterodimer that interacts with Rad51. Five human Rad51 paralogs have been identified (XRCC2, XRCC3, Rad51B/Rad51L1, Rad51C/Rad51L2, and Rad51D/Rad51L3), and each interacts with one or more of the others. Previously we reported that HsRad51 interacts with XRCC3, and Rad51C interacts with XRCC3, Rad51B, and HsRad51. Here we report that in the yeast two-hybrid system, Rad51D interacts with XRCC2 and Rad51C. No other interactions, including self-interactions, were found, indicating that the observed interactions are specific. The yeast Rad51 interacts with human Rad51 and XRCC3, suggesting Rad51 conservation since the human yeast divergence. Data from yeast three-hybrid experiments indicate that a number of the pairs of interactions between human Rad51 paralogs can occur simultaneously. For example, Rad51B expression enhances the binding of Rad51C to XRCC3 and to HsRad51D, and Rad51C expression allows the indirect interaction of Rad51B with Rad51D. Experiments using 6xHis-tagged proteins in the baculovirus system confirm several of our yeast results, including Rad51B interaction with Rad51D only when Rad51C is simultaneously expressed and Rad51C interaction with XRCC2 only when Rad51D is present. These results suggest that these proteins may participate in one complex or multiple smaller ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sung, P. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.9.1111 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., & Jasin, M. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a016600 · Cited by 869
Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links
Dronkert, M. L. G., & Kanaar, R. (2001) · Mutation Research/DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/s0921-8777(01)00092-1 · Cited by 555
The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer
Thacker, J. (2005) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.08.018 · Cited by 342
Mechanisms of eukaryotic DNA double strand break repair
Cahill, D. (2006) · Frontiers in bioscience · doi:10.2741/1938 · Cited by 129
Role of recA/RAD51 family proteins in mammals.
(2005) · PubMed · doi:10.18926/amo/31987 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Schild, D., Lio, Y.-C., Collins, D. W., Tsomondo, T., & Chen, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 16443-16449
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994670518
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for Simultaneous Protein Interactions between Human Rad51 Paralogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m001473200
- The paper
- Schild, D., Lio, Y.-C., Collins, D. W., Tsomondo, T., & Chen, D. J. (2000). Evidence for Simultaneous Protein Interactions between Human Rad51 Paralogs. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m001473200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.