DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins
Open accessAbstract
STAT transcription factors are expressed in many cell types and bind to similar sequences. However, different STAT gene knock-outs show very distinct phenotypes. To determine whether differences between the binding specificities of STAT proteins account for these effects, we compared the sequences bound by STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. One sequence set was selected from random oligonucleotides by recombinant STAT1, STAT5A, or STAT6. For another set including many weak binding sites, we quantified the relative affinities to STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. We compared the results to the binding sites in natural STAT target genes identified by others. The experiments confirmed the similar specificity of different STAT proteins. Detailed analysis indicated that STAT5A specificity is more similar to that of STAT6 than that of STAT1, as expected from the evolutionary relationships. The preference of STAT6 for sites in which the half-palindromes (TTC) are separated by four nucleotides (N(4)) was confirmed, but analysis of weak binding sites showed that STAT6 binds fairly well to N(3) sites. As previously reported, STAT1 and STAT5 prefer N(3) sites; however, STAT5A, but not STAT1, weakly binds N(4) sites. None of the STATs bound to half-palindromes. There were no specificity differences between STAT5A and STAT5B.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Upon STAT3 activation, dimers directly bind DNA at TT(N)4-6AA consensus sites and regulate transcription of specific target genes.
“Upon STAT3 activation, dimers directly bind DNA at TT(N)4–6AA consensus sites and regulate transcription of specific target genes.7”
From Critical analysis of the potential for targeting STAT3 in human malignancy (2013) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Kessler, D. S., Veals, S. A., Fu, X. Y., & Levy, D. E. (1990) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.4.10.1753 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Stat1 Depends on Transcriptional Synergy with Sp1
Look, D. C., Pelletier, M. R., Tidwell, R. M., Roswit, W. T., & Holtzman, M. J. (1995) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.270.51.30264 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tebbutt, N. C., Giraud, A. S., Inglese, M., Jenkins, B., Waring, P., Clay, F. J., Malki, S., Alderman, B. M., Grail, D., Hollande, F., et al. (2002) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm763 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Gray, M. J., Poljakovic, M., Kepka-Lenhart, D., & Morris, S. M. (2005) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.04.004 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Wermter, A., Kamp‐Becker, I., Hesse, P., Schulte‐Körne, G., Strauch, K., & Remschmidt, H. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.31032 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Characterization of the Nuclear Factor-κB Responsiveness of the Human dio2 Gene
Zeöld, A., Doleschall, M., Haffner, M. C., Capelo, L. P., Menyhért, J., Liposits, Z., da Silva, W. S., Bianco, A. C., Kacskovics, I., Fekete, C., et al. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2005-1608 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Critical analysis of the potential for targeting STAT3 in human malignancy
Grandis, J., & Peyser (2013) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s47903 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“For example, gene amplification of PDGFR α or EGFR in distinct subsets of glial tumors leads to enhanced expression of those proteins and downstream signaling events, including activation of STAT3.”
InfluentialTranscriptional signature induced by a metastasis‐promoting c‐Src mutant in a human breast cell line
Broecker, F., Hardt, C., Herwig, R., Timmermann, B., Kerick, M., Wunderlich, A., Schweiger, M. R., Borsig, L., Heikenwalder, M., Lehrach, H., et al. (2016) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.13694 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ehret, G. B., Reichenbach, P., Schindler, U., Horvath, C. M., Fritz, S., Nabholz, M., & Bucher, P.
- Affiliations
- ISREC Foundation (CH)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ehret, Georg B.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6675-6688
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071516626
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- STAT proteins, DNA binding specificity, STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, STAT6, transcription factor binding sites
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Milk Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Trans-Activators, Response Elements, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, STAT1 Transcription Factor, STAT5 Transcription Factor, STAT6 Transcription Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review