Cited by 369Cytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEstrogen and related hormone effects

DNA Binding Specificity of Different STAT Proteins

Open access
Ehret, Georg B., Reichenbach, Patrick, Schindler, Ulrike, Horvath, Curt M., Fritz, Stefan, Nabholz, Markus, Bucher, Philipp·2001·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

STAT transcription factors are expressed in many cell types and bind to similar sequences. However, different STAT gene knock-outs show very distinct phenotypes. To determine whether differences between the binding specificities of STAT proteins account for these effects, we compared the sequences bound by STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. One sequence set was selected from random oligonucleotides by recombinant STAT1, STAT5A, or STAT6. For another set including many weak binding sites, we quantified the relative affinities to STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, and STAT6. We compared the results to the binding sites in natural STAT target genes identified by others. The experiments confirmed the similar specificity of different STAT proteins. Detailed analysis indicated that STAT5A specificity is more similar to that of STAT6 than that of STAT1, as expected from the evolutionary relationships. The preference of STAT6 for sites in which the half-palindromes (TTC) are separated by four nucleotides (N(4)) was confirmed, but analysis of weak binding sites showed that STAT6 binds fairly well to N(3) sites. As previously reported, STAT1 and STAT5 prefer N(3) sites; however, STAT5A, but not STAT1, weakly binds N(4) sites. None of the STATs bound to half-palindromes. There were no specificity differences between STAT5A and STAT5B.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m001748200

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upon STAT3 activation, dimers directly bind DNA at TT(N)4-6AA consensus sites and regulate transcription of specific target genes.

    “Upon STAT3 activation, dimers directly bind DNA at TT(N)4–6AA consensus sites and regulate transcription of specific target genes.7”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehret, G. B., Reichenbach, P., Schindler, U., Horvath, C. M., Fritz, S., Nabholz, M., & Bucher, P.
Affiliations
  • ISREC Foundation (CH)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Ehret, Georg B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
276
Issue
9
Pages
6675-6688
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071516626
Cited by
369
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
STAT proteins, DNA binding specificity, STAT1, STAT5A, STAT5B, STAT6, transcription factor binding sites
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Milk Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Trans-Activators, Response Elements, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, STAT1 Transcription Factor, STAT5 Transcription Factor, STAT6 Transcription Factor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review