Cited by 118

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Angiopoietin-like Protein 3 Inhibits Lipoprotein Lipase Activity through Enhancing Its Cleavage by Proprotein Convertases

Liu, Jun, Afroza, Huq, Rader, Daniel J., Jin, Weijun·2010·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m110.144279

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ANGPTL3-increased LPL cleavage was not prevented by the presence of GPIHBP1 or heparan sulfate proteoglycans.

    “Interestingly, this cleavage was not prevented by the presence of GPIHBP1 or heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) (132).”
  • ANGPTL3 increased the cleavage of LPL by PACE4, but not PCKS5.

    “Liu et al. (132) found that ANGPTL3 increased the cleavage of LPL by PACE4, but not PCKS5.”
  • ANGPTL3 contains a protease cleavage site and in vivo can be cleaved into two domains both intracellularly by PCSK3 and extracellularly by PACE4.

    “ANGPTL3 contains a protease cleavage site, and in vivo can be cleaved into two domains both intracellularly by PCSK3 and extracellularly by PACE4 (107, 124, 131, 132).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Nakayama, 2009, J. Med. Genet., 46, 370, 10.1136/jmg.2008.064063 · DOI
  2. Hegele, 2009, Hum. Mol. Genet., 18, 4189, 10.1093/hmg/ddp361 · DOI
  3. Wang, 2008, Hum. Mol. Genet., 17, 2894, 10.1093/hmg/ddn188 · DOI
  4. Romeo, 2009, J. Clin. Invest., 119, 70
  5. Shimamura, 2007, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 27, 366, 10.1161/01.ATV.0000252827.51626.89 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yilmaz, 2009, Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 21, 1247, 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32832b77ae · DOI
  7. Miida, 2010, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 21, 70, 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328333269e · DOI
  8. Shan, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 1419, 10.1074/jbc.M808477200 · DOI
  9. Stejskal, 2007, Gen. Physiol. Biophys., 26, 230
  10. Robciuc, 2010, J. Lipid Res., 51, 824, 10.1194/jlr.M002618 · DOI
  11. Sonnenburg, 2009, J. Lipid Res., 50, 2421, 10.1194/jlr.M900145-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ge, 2005, J. Lipid Res., 46, 1484, 10.1194/jlr.M500005-JLR200 · DOI
  13. Wicher, 1996, J. Immunol. Methods, 192, 1, 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00260-X · DOI
  14. Semenkovich, 1989, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 9030, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)81898-1 · DOI
  15. Jin, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 36551, 10.1074/jbc.M502264200 · DOI
  16. Griffon, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 23322, 10.1074/jbc.M109.037002 · DOI
  17. Jin, 2007, Cell Metab., 6, 129, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.07.009 · DOI
  18. Nour, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5215, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0504 · DOI
  19. Mayer, 2008, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 2373, 10.1074/jbc.M708763200 · DOI
  20. Jin, 2003, Circ. Res., 92, 644, 10.1161/01.RES.0000064502.47539.6D · DOI
  21. Fuki, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 34331, 10.1074/jbc.M302181200 · DOI
  22. Liu, 2000, Biochemistry, 39, 9201, 10.1021/bi0009441 · DOI
  23. Li, 2008, Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 40, 459, 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00421.x · DOI
  24. Seidah, 1999, Brain Res., 848, 45, 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01909-5 · DOI
  25. Yau, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 11942, 10.1074/jbc.M809802200 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lee, 2009, J. Biol. Chem., 284, 13735, 10.1074/jbc.M807899200 · DOI
  27. Ono, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 41804, 10.1074/jbc.M302861200 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Beigneux, 2007, Cell Metab., 5, 279, 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.02.002 · DOI
  29. Seidah, 2008, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 40, 1111, 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.01.030 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Seidah, 1999, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 885, 57, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08665.x · DOI
  31. Scamuffa, 2006, FASEB J., 20, 1954, 10.1096/fj.05-5491rev · DOI
  32. Seidah, 1994, Biochimie, 76, 197, 10.1016/0300-9084(94)90147-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, J., Afroza, H., Rader, D. J., & Jin, W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
285
Issue
36
Pages
27561-27570
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
118
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review