Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERK Activation Mediates Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis after DNA Damage Independently of p53

Open access
Tang, Damu, Wu, Dongcheng, Hirao, Atsushi, Lahti, Jill M., Liu, Lieqi, Mazza, Brie, Kidd, Vincent J., Mak, Tak W., Ingram, Alistair J.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

In response to DNA damage, ataxia-telangiectasia mutant and ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad-3 activate p53, resulting in either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. We report here that DNA damage stimuli, including etoposide (ETOP), adriamycin (ADR), ionizing irradiation (IR), and ultraviolet irradiation (UV) activate ERK1/2 (ERK) mitogen-activated protein kinase in primary (MEF and IMR90), immortalized (NIH3T3) and transformed (MCF-7) cells. ERK activation in response to ETOP was abolished in ATM-/- fibroblasts (GM05823) and was independent of p53. The MEK1 inhibitor PD98059 prevented ERK activation but not p53 stabilization. Maximal ERK activation in response to DNA damage was not attenuated in MEF(p53-/-). However, ERK activation contributes to either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to low or high intensity DNA insults, respectively. Inhibition of ERK activation by PD98059 or U0126 attenuated p21(CIP1) induction, resulting in partial release of the G(2)/M cell cycle arrest induced by ETOP. Furthermore, PD98059 or U0126 also strongly attenuated apoptosis induced by high dose ETOP, ADR, or UV. Conversely, enforced activation of ERK by overexpression of MEK-1/Q56P sensitized cells to DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Taken together, these results indicate that DNA damage activates parallel ERK and p53 pathways in an ATM-dependent manner. These pathways might function cooperatively in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m111598200

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Metadata

Authors
Tang, D., Wu, D., Hirao, A., Lahti, J. M., Liu, L., Mazza, B., Kidd, V. J., Mak, T. W., & Ingram, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
277
Issue
15
Pages
12710-12717
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974302097
Cited by
422
References
63
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ERK Activation Mediates Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis after DNA Damage Independently of p53. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m111598200
The paper
Tang, D., Wu, D., Hirao, A., Lahti, J. M., Liu, L., Mazza, B., Kidd, V. J., Mak, T. W., & Ingram, A. J. (2002). ERK Activation Mediates Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis after DNA Damage Independently of p53. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m111598200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.