Changes in signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) dynamics induced by complexation with pharmacological inhibitors of Src homology 2 (SH2) domain dimerization
Open accessAbstract
The activity of the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is dysregulated in a number of hematological and solid malignancies. Development of pharmacological STAT3 Src homology 2 (SH2) domain interaction inhibitors holds great promise for cancer therapy, and a novel class of salicylic acid-based STAT3 dimerization inhibitors that includes orally bioavailable drug candidates has been recently developed. The compounds SF-1-066 and BP-1-102 are predicted to bind to the STAT3 SH2 domain. However, given the highly unstructured and dynamic nature of the SH2 domain, experimental confirmation of this prediction was elusive. We have interrogated the protein-ligand interaction of STAT3 with these small molecule inhibitors by means of time-resolved electrospray ionization hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry. Analysis of site-specific evolution of deuterium uptake induced by the complexation of STAT3 with SF-1-066 or BP-1-102 under physiological conditions enabled the mapping of the in silico predicted inhibitor binding site to the STAT3 SH2 domain. The binding of both inhibitors to the SH2 domain resulted in significant local decreases in dynamics, consistent with solvent exclusion at the inhibitor binding site and increased rigidity of the inhibitor-complexed SH2 domain. Interestingly, inhibitor binding induced hot spots of allosteric perturbations outside of the SH2 domain, manifesting mainly as increased deuterium uptake, in regions of STAT3 important for DNA binding and nuclear localization.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
STAT3 inhibitors-SF-1-066, BP-1-102, and MM206-may, in addition to binding to the SH2 domain, affect the function of the SH2 domain by binding to and perturbing the structure of domains of STAT3 at a distance from the SH2 domain, suggesting an allosteric destabilizing effect on the SH2 domain.
“For example, hydrogen–deuterium exchange experiments and other studies show that STAT3 inhibitors—SF-1-066, BP-1-102, and MM206—may, in addition to binding to the SH2 domain, affect the function of the SH2 domain by binding to and perturbing the structure of domains of STAT3 at a distance from the SH2 domain, suggesting an allosteric destabilizing effect on the SH2 domain (Resetca et al., 2014;”
From Targeting Janus Kinases and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 To Treat Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Cancer: Rationale, Progress, and Caution (2020) · cites this paper as Resetca et al., 2014
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The role of STATs in transcriptional control and their impact on cellular function
Bromberg, J., & Darnell, J. E. (2000) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203476 · Cited by 1,201 · see citing works
Dynamic Allostery: Linkers Are Not Merely Flexible
Ma, B., Tsai, C.-J., Haliloğlu, T., & Nussinov, R. (2011) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2011.06.002 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Yue, P., Fletcher, S., Zhao, W., Gunning, P. T., & Turkson, J. (2010) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2010.01.001 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Ladbury, J. E., Lemmon, M. A., Zhou, M., Green, J., Botfield, M. C., and Schlessinger, J. (1995) Measurement of the binding of tyrosyl phospho- peptides to SH2 domains: a reappraisal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 3199 -3203
- Page, B. D., Ball, D. P., and Gunning, P. T. (2011) Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 inhibitors: a patent review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 21, 65-83
- Moran, M. F., Koch, C. A., Anderson, D., Ellis, C., England, L., Martin, G. S., and Pawson, T. (1990) Src homology region 2 domains direct pro- tein-protein interactions in signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
- Zhang, X., Yue, P., Page, B. D., Li, T., Zhao, W., Namanja, A. T., Paladino, D., Zhao, J., Chen, Y., Gunning, P. T., and Turkson, J. (2012) Orally bio- available small-molecule inhibitor of transcription factor Stat3 regresses human breast and lung cancer xenografts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 9623-9628
- Iacob, R. E., Pene-Dumitrescu, T., Zhang, J., Gray, N. S., Smithgall, T. E., and Engen, J. R. (2009) Conformational disturbance in Abl kinase upon mutation and deregulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 1386 -1391
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bharadwaj, U., Kasembeli, M. M., Robinson, P., & Tweardy, D. J. (2020) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.119.018440 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
“…MM206— may, in addition to binding to the SH2 domain, affect the function of the SH2 domain by binding to and perturbing the structure of domains of STAT3 at a distance from the SH2 domain, suggesting an allosteric destabilizing effect on the SH2 domain (Resetca et al., 2014; Minus et al., 2015).”
Background
- Authors
- Resetca, D., Haftchenary, S., Gunning, P. T., & Wilson, D. J.
- Affiliations
- York University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Derek J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 47
- Pages
- 32538-32547
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4239608
- OpenAlex
- W2071278507
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Breast Cancer Research Foundation
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- STAT3, SH2 domain, protein dynamics, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, cancer therapy
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Aminosalicylic Acids, Animals, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Protein Binding, Sulfonamides, Molecular Structure, src Homology Domains, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Deuterium Exchange Measurement, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice, Small Molecule Libraries, Protein Multimerization, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review