CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The γ Secretase-generated Carboxyl-terminal Domain of the Amyloid Precursor Protein Induces Apoptosis via Tip60 in H4 Cells

Kinoshita, Ayae, Whelan, Christa M., Berezovska, Oksana, Hyman, Bradley T.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m203372200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m203372200

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LRP-ICD translocates to the nucleus and interacts with Fe65 and Tip60.

    “Although LRP-ICD has been shown to translocate to the nucleus and interact with Fe65 and Tip60 (28,47), whether or not it has a transcriptional role under physiological conditions remains unknown.”

    From The Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein (LRP) Is a Novel β-Secretase (BACE1) Substrate (2005) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Results and Discussion describe APP-CT, not LRP-ICD, translocating to the nucleus and interacting with Fe65 and Tip60; no page numbers are available in our copy. Searches for LRP-ICD, its expanded name, and LRP found no passage addressing whether LRP-ICD does so. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Citron, 2000, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 920, 192, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06921.x · DOI
  2. Esch, 1990, Science, 248, 1122, 10.1126/science.2111583 · DOI
  3. Sisodia, 1990, Science, 248, 492, 10.1126/science.1691865 · DOI
  4. Hussain, 1999, Mol. Cell Neurosci., 14, 419, 10.1006/mcne.1999.0811 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sinha, 1999, Nature, 402, 537, 10.1038/990114 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yan, 1999, Nature, 402, 533, 10.1038/990107 · DOI · Paper page
  7. De Strooper, 1999, Nature, 398, 518, 10.1038/19083 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ray, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 36801, 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36801 · DOI
  9. Song, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 6959, 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6959 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Steiner, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 28669, 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28669 · DOI
  11. Struhl, 1999, Nature, 398, 522, 10.1038/19091 · DOI
  12. Ye, 1999, Nature, 398, 525, 10.1038/19096 · DOI
  13. Berezovska, 2000, J. Neurochem., 75, 583, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0750583.x · DOI
  14. Artavanis-Tsakonas, 1995, Science, 268, 225, 10.1126/science.7716513 · DOI
  15. Cupers, 2001, J. Neurochem., 78, 1168, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00516.x · DOI
  16. Kimberly, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 40288, 10.1074/jbc.C100447200 · DOI
  17. Cao, 2001, Science, 293, 115, 10.1126/science.1058783 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Gao, 2001, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 14979, 10.1073/pnas.261463298 · DOI
  19. Leissring, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 4697, 10.1073/pnas.072033799 · DOI
  20. Ikura, 2000, Cell, 102, 463, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00051-9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. McLean, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 8812, 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8812 · DOI
  22. Kinoshita, 2001, J. Neurosci., 21, 8354, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08354.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Berezovska, 1999, Neuroscience, 93, 433, 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00157-8 · DOI
  24. Daly, 1999, Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry, 23, 861, 10.1016/S0278-5846(99)00046-9 · DOI
  25. Lu, 2000, Nat. Med., 4, 397, 10.1038/74656 · DOI
  26. Bertrand, 2001, Mol. Cell Neurosci., 18, 503, 10.1006/mcne.2001.1030 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Sastre, 2001, EMBO Rep., 2, 835, 10.1093/embo-reports/kve180 · DOI
  28. Borg, 1996, Mol. Cell Biol., 16, 6229, 10.1128/MCB.16.11.6229 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kinoshita, A., Whelan, C. M., Berezovska, O., & Hyman, B. T.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-08
Volume
277
Issue
32
Pages
28530-28536
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m203372200
Cited by
109
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review