The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Change of Conformation of the DNA-binding Domain of p53 Is the Only Key Element for Binding of and Interference with p73
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This evolution goes along with increased sensitivity of the p53 DBD to structural stress compared with the more stable paralogs p63 and p73.”
From Evolutionary history of the p53 family DNA-binding domain: insights from an Alvinella pompejana homolog (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crystal Structure of a p53 Tumor Suppressor-DNA Complex: Understanding Tumorigenic Mutations
Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., & Pavletich, N. P. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8023157 · Cited by 2,551
Definition of a consensus binding site for p53
El-Deiry, W. S., Kern, S. E., Pietenpol, J. A., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1992) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0492-45 · Cited by 1,985
Structural Aspects of the p53 Protein in Relation to Gene Evolution: A Second Look
Soussi, T., & May, P. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0425 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Levine, 1997, Cell, 88, 323, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81871-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2000, Genes Dev., 14, 981, 10.1101/gad.827700 · DOI · Paper page
- Yu, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 14517, 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14517 · DOI · Paper page
- Soussi, 2001, Nat. Rev. Cancer, 1, 233, 10.1038/35106009 · DOI · Paper page
- Milner, 1995, Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 49, 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)88954-9 · DOI
- Milner, 1984, Nature, 310, 143, 10.1038/310143a0 · DOI
- Gannon, 1990, EMBO J., 9, 1595, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08279.x · DOI · Paper page
- Ory, 1994, EMBO J., 13, 3496, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06656.x · DOI · Paper page
- Legros, 1994, Oncogene, 9, 3689
- Michalovitz, 1990, Cell, 62, 671, 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90113-S · DOI · Paper page
- Hainaut, 1995, Br. J. Cancer, 71, 227, 10.1038/bjc.1995.48 · DOI
- Hupp, 1992, Cell, 71, 875, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-Q · DOI · Paper page
- Hardy-Bessard, 1998, Oncogene, 16, 883, 10.1038/sj.onc.1201598 · DOI
- Hupp, 1995, Cell, 83, 237, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90165-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, 1998, Mol. Cell, 2, 305, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80275-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaghad, 1997, Cell, 90, 809, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80540-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Yang, 2000, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 1, 199, 10.1038/35043127 · DOI · Paper page
- Ikawa, 1999, Cell Death Differ., 6, 1154, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400631 · DOI
- Levrero, 1999, Cell Death Differ., 6, 1146, 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400624 · DOI
- Hibi, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 5462, 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5462 · DOI · Paper page
- Davison, 1999, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 18709, 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18709 · DOI · Paper page
- Gaiddon, 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 1874, 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1874-1887.2001 · DOI · Paper page
- Strano, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 29503, 10.1074/jbc.M003360200 · DOI · Paper page
- Marin, 2000, Nat. Genet., 25, 47, 10.1038/75586 · DOI · Paper page
- Strano, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 272, 18817, 10.1074/jbc.M201405200 · DOI · Paper page
- Yuan, 1999, Nature, 399, 809, 10.1038/21704 · DOI · Paper page
- Agami, 1999, Nature, 399, 806, 10.1038/21697 · DOI · Paper page
- Jost, 1999, Nature, 399, 814, 10.1038/21710 · DOI
- Soussi, 1989, J. Virol., 63, 3894, 10.1128/jvi.63.9.3894-3901.1989 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, 1995, Oncogene, 10, 779
- Burge, 1997, J. Mol. Biol., 268, 78, 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0951 · DOI · Paper page
- Le Bras, 2002, Oncogene, 21, 1304, 10.1038/sj.onc.1205189 · DOI
- Ko, 1996, Genes Dev., 10, 1054, 10.1101/gad.10.9.1054 · DOI · Paper page
- Hansen, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 3917, 10.1074/jbc.271.7.3917 · DOI
- Milner, 1991, Cell, 65, 765, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90384-B · DOI · Paper page
- Bullock, 2000, Oncogene, 19, 1245, 10.1038/sj.onc.1203434 · DOI · Paper page
- Flores, 2002, Nature, 416, 560, 10.1038/416560a · DOI · Paper page
- DiComo, 1999, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 1438, 10.1128/MCB.19.2.1438 · DOI · Paper page
- Waddell, 2001, Oncogene, 20, 6001, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204702 · DOI
- Zhang, 1994, EMBO J., 13, 2535, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06543.x · DOI
- Gu, 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 1243, 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1243-1253.2000 · DOI
Cited by
Gain of function of mutant p53 by coaggregation with multiple tumor suppressors
Xu, J., Reumers, J., Couceiro, J. R., De Smet, F., Gallardo, R., Rudyak, S., Cornelis, A., Rozenski, J., Zwolinska, A., Marine, J.-C., et al. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.546 · Cited by 543
Translating p53 into the clinic
Cheok, C. F., Verma, C. S., Baselga, J., & Lane, D. P. (2011) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.174 · Cited by 381
Reactivation of mutant p53: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential
Selivanova, G., & Wiman, K. G. (2007) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210295 · Cited by 186
Zhang, Q., Balourdas, D.-I., Baron, B., Senitzki, A., Haran, T. E., Wiman, K. G., Soussi, T., & Joerger, A. C. (2022) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-022-04653-8 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bensaad, K., Le Bras, M., Unsal, K., Strano, S., Blandino, G., Tominaga, O., Rouillard, D., & Soussi, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 10546-10555
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor, 6424 d)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Change of Conformation of the DNA-binding Domain of p53 Is the Only Key Element for Binding of and Interference with p73. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m208233200
- The paper
- Bensaad, K., Le Bras, M., Unsal, K., Strano, S., Blandino, G., Tominaga, O., Rouillard, D., & Soussi, T. (2003). Change of Conformation of the DNA-binding Domain of p53 Is the Only Key Element for Binding of and Interference with p73. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m208233200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
