CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo and in Vitro Reconstitution of Atg8 Conjugation Essential for Autophagy

Ichimura, Yoshinobu, Imamura, Yuko, Emoto, Kazuo, Umeda, Masato, Noda, Takeshi, Ohsumi, Yoshinori·2004·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m405860200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m405860200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EGFP has a relatively neutral pH optimum for fluorescence, and its signal diminishes quickly during live cell imaging due to the acidic environment of the lysosome.

    “Along these lines, a caution concerning the use of the EGFP fluorescent protein for microscopy is that this fluorophore has a relatively neutral pH optimum for fluorescence [263], and its signal diminishes quickly during live cell imaging due to the acidic environment of the lysosome.”

    From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [263]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Klionsky, 1999, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 15, 1, 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.1 · DOI
  2. Huang, 2002, Cell Struct. Funct., 27, 409, 10.1247/csf.27.409 · DOI
  3. Wang, 2003, Mol. Med., 9, 65, 10.1007/BF03402040 · DOI
  4. Klionsky, 2003, Dev. Cell, 5, 539, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00296-X · DOI
  5. Mizushima, 2002, Cell Struct. Funct., 27, 421, 10.1247/csf.27.421 · DOI
  6. Mizushima, 1998, Nature, 395, 395, 10.1038/26506 · DOI
  7. Ichimura, 2000, Nature, 408, 488, 10.1038/35044114 · DOI
  8. Tanida, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 1367, 10.1091/mbc.10.5.1367 · DOI
  9. Shintani, 1999, EMBO J., 18, 5234, 10.1093/emboj/18.19.5234 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kuma, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 18619, 10.1074/jbc.M111889200 · DOI
  11. Lang, 1998, EMBO J., 17, 3597, 10.1093/emboj/17.13.3597 · DOI
  12. Kirisako, 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 263, 10.1083/jcb.151.2.263 · DOI
  13. Sagiv, 2000, EMBO J., 19, 1494, 10.1093/emboj/19.7.1494 · DOI
  14. Wang, 1999, Nature, 397, 69, 10.1038/16264 · DOI
  15. Tanida, 2003, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 300, 637, 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)02907-8 · DOI
  16. Hemelaar, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 51841, 10.1074/jbc.M308762200 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Abeliovich, 2000, J. Cell Biol., 151, 1025, 10.1083/jcb.151.5.1025 · DOI
  18. Saha, 1996, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 60, 111, 10.1271/bbb.60.111 · DOI
  19. Guzman, 1995, J. Bacteriol., 177, 4121, 10.1128/JB.177.14.4121-4130.1995 · DOI
  20. Bligh, 1959, Can. J. Med. Sci., 37, 911
  21. Bartlett, 1958, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 75, 110, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1958.tb36855.x · DOI
  22. Takahashi, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 48973, 10.1074/jbc.M109295200 · DOI
  23. Cullis, 1979, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 559, 399, 10.1016/0304-4157(79)90012-1 · DOI
  24. Tuller, 1999, Yeast, 15, 1555, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199910)15:14<1555::AID-YEA479>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  25. Verkleij, 2000, J. Membr. Biol., 178, 1, 10.1007/s002320010009 · DOI
  26. Komatsu, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 9846, 10.1074/jbc.M007737200 · DOI
  27. Paz, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 25445, 10.1074/jbc.C000307200 · DOI
  28. Stangler, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 13363, 10.1074/jbc.C200050200 · DOI
  29. Sugawara, 2004, Genes Cells, 9, 611, 10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00750.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. Coyle, 2002, Neuron, 33, 63, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00558-X · DOI
  31. Legesse-Miller, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 32966, 10.1074/jbc.M000917200 · DOI
  32. Suzuki, 2001, EMBO J., 20, 5971, 10.1093/emboj/20.21.5971 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ichimura, Y., Imamura, Y., Emoto, K., Umeda, M., Noda, T., & Ohsumi, Y.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
279
Issue
39
Pages
40584-40592
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m405860200
Cited by
193
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review