Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Biochemical Characterization of Two Carotenoid Cleavage Enzymes from Arabidopsis Indicates That a Carotenoid-derived Compound Inhibits Lateral Branching

Open access
Schwartz, Steven H., Qin, Xiaoqiong, Loewen, Michele C.·2004·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Enzymes that are able to oxidatively cleave carotenoids at specific positions have been identified in animals and plants. The first such enzyme to be identified was a nine-cis-epoxy carotenoid dioxygenase from maize, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Similar enzymes are necessary for the synthesis of vitamin A in animals and other carotenoid-derived molecules in plants. In the model plant, Arabidopsis, there are nine hypothetical proteins that share some degree of sequence similarity to the nine-cis-epoxy carotenoid dioxygenases. Five of these proteins appear to be involved in abscisic acid biosynthesis. The remaining four proteins are expected to catalyze other carotenoid cleavage reactions and have been named carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs). The hypothetical proteins, AtCCD7 and AtCCD8, are the most disparate members of this protein family in Arabidopsis. The max3 and max4 mutants in Arabidopsis result from lesions in AtCCD7 and AtCCD8. Both mutants display a dramatic increase in lateral branching and are believed to be impaired in the synthesis of an unidentified compound that inhibits axillary meristem development. To determine the biochemical function of AtCCD7, the protein was expressed in carotenoid-accumulating strains of Escherichia coli. The activity of AtCCD7 was also tested in vitro with several of the most common plant carotenoids. It was shown that the recombinant AtCCD7 protein catalyzes a specific 9-10 cleavage of beta-carotene to produce the 10 black triangle down-apo-beta-carotenal (C27) and beta-ionone (C13). When AtCCD7 and AtCCD8 were co-expressed in a beta-carotene-producing strain of E. coli, the 13-apo-beta-carotenone (C18) was produced. The C18 product appears to result from a secondary cleavage of the AtCCD7-derived C27 product. The sequential cleavages of beta-carotene by AtCCD7 and AtCCD8 are likely the initial steps in the synthesis of a carotenoid-derived signaling molecule that is necessary for the regulation lateral branching.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m409004200

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Leuenberger, 2001, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 40, 2614, 10.1002/1521-3773(20010716)40:14<2613::AID-ANIE2613>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  2. Schwartz, 1997, Science, 276, 1872, 10.1126/science.276.5320.1872 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Burbidge, 1999, Plant J., 17, 427, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00386.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Chernys, 2000, Plant Physiol., 124, 343, 10.1104/pp.124.1.343 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Iuchi, 2000, Plant Physiol., 123, 553, 10.1104/pp.123.2.553 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Qin, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 15354, 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15354 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schwartz, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 25208, 10.1074/jbc.M102146200 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bouvier, 2003, Science, 300, 2089, 10.1126/science.1085162 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bouvier, 2003, Plant Cell, 15, 47, 10.1105/tpc.006536 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Lindqvist, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 23942, 10.1074/jbc.M202756200 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Paik, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 32160, 10.1074/jbc.M010086200 · DOI
  12. Wyss, 2000, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 271, 334, 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2619 · DOI
  13. Iuchi, 2001, Plant J., 27, 325, 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Booker, 2004, Curr. Biol., 14, 1232, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.061 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Yamada, 2003, Science, 302, 842, 10.1126/science.1088305 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sun, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 24349, 10.1074/jbc.271.40.24349 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Rock, 1991, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 88, 7496, 10.1073/pnas.88.17.7496 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Redmond, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 6560, 10.1074/jbc.M009030200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kiefer, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 14110, 10.1074/jbc.M011510200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Barua, 2000, J. Nutr., 130, 1996, 10.1093/jn/130.8.1996 · DOI
  21. Makoto, 2001, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 11, 884
  22. Das, 1978, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 2081, 10.1021/j100508a009 · DOI
  23. Tanumihardjo, 2001, J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm., 44, 365, 10.1002/jlcr.464 · doi:10.1002/jlcr.464
  24. Napoli, 1996, Plant Physiol., 111, 27, 10.1104/pp.111.1.27 · DOI
  25. Turnbull, 2002, Plant J., 32, 255, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01419.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pogson, 1996, Plant Cell, 8, 1627
  27. Liu, 1998, Curr. Biol., 8, 1300, 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00560-X · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kamoda, 1993, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 57, 931, 10.1271/bbb.57.931 · DOI

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, S. H., Qin, X., & Loewen, M. C.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
279
Issue
45
Pages
46940-46945
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100149169
Cited by
310
References
4
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Biochemical Characterization of Two Carotenoid Cleavage Enzymes from Arabidopsis Indicates That a Carotenoid-derived Compound Inhibits Lateral Branching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m409004200
The paper
Schwartz, S. H., Qin, X., & Loewen, M. C. (2004). The Biochemical Characterization of Two Carotenoid Cleavage Enzymes from Arabidopsis Indicates That a Carotenoid-derived Compound Inhibits Lateral Branching. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m409004200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.