CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Dissection of an AP-2 β2 Appendage-binding Sequence within the Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia Protein

Mishra, Sanjay K., Keyel, Peter A., Edeling, Melissa A., Dupin, Amie L., Owen, David J., Traub, Linton M.·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m501029200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m501029200

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ARH-F259A, which is unable to bind AP2, exits the nucleus upon CD8/LDLR overexpression but is not recruited into CCPs.

    “Upon overexpression of CD8/LDLR, ARH-F259A exited the nucleus, but was not recruited into CCPs (Fig. 5 B).”

    From Cargo- and adaptor-specific mechanisms regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis (2010) · cites this paper as Mishra et al., 2005

    The Results and Discussion report that F259A abolishes ARH binding to AP-2 and that GFP-tagged ARH fragments bearing F259A lose colocalization with AP-2. This supports the AP-2-binding aspect and is consistent with impaired recruitment to coated regions, but our copy does not report ARH-F259A exiting the nucleus upon CD8/LDLR overexpression or directly test its recruitment to CCPs under that condition. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Residues 252-268 of ARH bind the β2-adaptin subunit of AP-2.

    “Following the clathrin box motif, the protein has a highly conserved amino acid sequence (residues 252-268) that binds the ␤2-adaptin subunit of the adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) (13,15).”

    From The Modular Adaptor Protein Autosomal Recessive Hypercholesterolemia (ARH) Promotes Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Clustering into Clathrin-coated Pits (2005) · cites this paper as [15]

  • ARH can interact directly with both clathrin and AP2 complexes.

    “ARH can interact directly with both clathrin (He et al., 2002) and AP2 complexes (Mishra et al., 2005)”

    From Cargo- and adaptor-specific mechanisms regulate clathrin-mediated endocytosis (2010) · cites this paper as Mishra et al., 2005

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Bonifacino, 2003, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 4, 409, 10.1038/nrm1099 · DOI
  2. Conner, 2003, Nature, 422, 37, 10.1038/nature01451 · DOI
  3. Robinson, 2004, Trends Cell Biol., 14, 167, 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.02.002 · DOI
  4. Kirchhausen, 2000, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 1, 187, 10.1038/35043117 · DOI
  5. Conner, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 921, 10.1083/jcb.200108123 · DOI
  6. Bonifacino, 2003, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 72, 395, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161800 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Olusanya, 2001, Curr. Biol., 11, 896, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00240-8 · DOI
  8. Ricotta, 2002, J. Cell Biol., 156, 791, 10.1083/jcb.200111068 · DOI
  9. Collins, 2002, Cell, 109, 523, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00735-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Janvier, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 163, 1281, 10.1083/jcb.200307157 · DOI
  11. Traub, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 163, 203, 10.1083/jcb.200309175 · DOI
  12. Sorkin, 2004, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 16, 392, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.001 · DOI
  13. Chen, 1990, J. Biol. Chem., 265, 3116, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39742-X · DOI · Paper page
  14. Davis, 1986, Cell, 45, 15, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90533-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Boll, 2002, Traffic, 3, 590, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2002.30808.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Warren, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 17056, 10.1074/jbc.273.27.17056 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Motley, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 162, 909, 10.1083/jcb.200305145 · DOI
  18. Wu, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 44238, 10.1074/jbc.M309450200 · DOI
  19. Morris, 2001, Traffic, 2, 111, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.020206.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mishra, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 16099, 10.1073/pnas.252630799 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Zhou, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 44584, 10.1074/jbc.M308870200 · DOI
  22. Stolt, 2003, Structure (Lond.), 11, 569, 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Yun, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 36572, 10.1074/jbc.M304384200 · DOI
  24. Osono, 1995, J. Clin. Investig., 95, 1124, 10.1172/JCI117760 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Cohen, 2003, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 14, 121, 10.1097/00041433-200304000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Soutar, 2003, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 23, 1963, 10.1161/01.ATV.0000094410.66558.9A · DOI · Paper page
  27. Claing, 2002, Prog. Neurobiol., 66, 61, 10.1016/S0301-0082(01)00023-5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Marchese, 2003, Trends Biochem. Sci., 28, 369, 10.1016/S0968-0004(03)00134-8 · DOI
  29. Owen, 2004, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 32, 1, 10.1042/bst0320001 · DOI
  30. McMahon, 2004, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 16, 379, 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.009 · DOI
  31. Traub, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 8907, 10.1073/pnas.96.16.8907 · DOI
  32. Drake, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 6479, 10.1074/jbc.275.9.6479 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mishra, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 46191, 10.1074/jbc.M408095200 · DOI
  34. Drake, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 28700, 10.1074/jbc.M104226200 · DOI
  35. Laporte, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 9247, 10.1074/jbc.M108490200 · DOI
  36. Milano, 2002, Biochemistry, 41, 3321, 10.1021/bi015905j · DOI
  37. Kim, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 30760, 10.1074/jbc.M204528200 · DOI
  38. Owen, 2000, EMBO J., 19, 4216, 10.1093/emboj/19.16.4216 · DOI
  39. Chen, 1998, Nature, 394, 793, 10.1038/29555 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Owen, 1999, Cell, 97, 805, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80791-6 · DOI
  41. Brett, 2002, Structure (Lond.), 10, 797, 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00784-0 · DOI
  42. Ritter, 2003, EMBO Rep., 4, 1089, 10.1038/sj.embor.7400004 · DOI
  43. Jha, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 2281, 10.1074/jbc.M305644200 · DOI
  44. Walther, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 964, 10.1073/pnas.0307862100 · DOI
  45. Scheele, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 25357, 10.1074/jbc.M303738200 · DOI
  46. Laporte, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 23120, 10.1074/jbc.M002581200 · DOI
  47. Eden, 2002, J. Clin. Investig., 110, 1695, 10.1172/JCI0216445 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Hinrichsen, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 45160, 10.1074/jbc.M307290200 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Stang, 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 3591, 10.1091/mbc.e04-01-0041 · DOI
  50. Santini, 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 2463, 10.1242/jcs.113.13.2463 · DOI
  51. Tulipano, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 21374, 10.1074/jbc.M313522200 · DOI
  52. Collins, 2003, Nat. Struct. Biol., 10, 607, 10.1038/nsb955 · DOI
  53. Mills, 2003, J. Cell Biol., 160, 213, 10.1083/jcb.200208023 · DOI
  54. Mattera, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 31409, 10.1074/jbc.M402183200 · DOI
  55. Miele, 2004, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 11, 242, 10.1038/nsmb736 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, S. K., Keyel, P. A., Edeling, M. A., Dupin, A. L., Owen, D. J., & Traub, L. M.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
280
Issue
19
Pages
19270-19280
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m501029200
Cited by
52
References
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review