Cited by 52

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanisms of autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia

Cohen, Jonathan C., Kimmel, Marek, Polanski, Andrzej, Hobbs, Helen H.·2003·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

Purpose of review Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia (ARH) is a rare Mendelian dyslipidemia characterized by markedly elevated plasma LDL levels, xanthomatosis, and premature coronary artery disease. LDL receptor function is normal, or only moderately impaired in fibroblasts from ARH patients, but their cultured lymphocytes show increased cell-surface LDL binding, and impaired LDL degradation, consistent with a defect in LDL receptor internalization. Recently, the disorder was shown to be caused by mutations in a phosphotyrosine binding domain protein, ARH, which is required for internalization of low density lipoproteins in the liver. This review summarizes the findings of new investigations into the pathophysiology and molecular genetics of ARH. Recent findings All mutations that have been characterized to date preclude the synthesis of a full-length protein. GST-pulldown experiments indicate that the phosphotyrosine binding domain of ARH interacts with the internalization sequence (NPVY) in the cytoplasmic tail of LDLR, and that conserved motifs in the C-terminal portion of the protein bind to clathrin and to the beta2-adaptin subunit of AP-2. Summary The available data suggest that ARH functions as an adaptor protein that couples LDLR to the endocytic machinery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00041433-200304000-00002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Zuliani, 1999, Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 19, 802, 10.1161/01.ATV.19.3.802 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zuliani, 1995, Eur J Clin Invest, 25, 322, 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1995.tb01709.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Harada-Shiba, 12, Arterioscler Thromb, 1071-, 1078
  4. Schmidt, 1998, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 83, 2167, 10.1210/jc.83.6.2167 · DOI
  5. Norman, 1999, J Clin Invest, 104, 619, 10.1172/JCI6677 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Eden, 2001, Am J Hum Genet, 68, 653, 10.1086/318795 · DOI
  7. Garcia, 2001, Science, 292, 1394, 10.1126/science.1060458 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Wilund, 2002, Hum Mol Genet, 11, 3019, 10.1093/hmg/11.24.3019 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Al-Kateb, 2002, Circ Res, 90, 951, 10.1161/01.RES.0000018002.43041.08 · DOI
  10. Shen, 1994, J Biol Chem, 269, 8466, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37217-4 · DOI
  11. Frischmeyer, 1999, Hum Mol Genet, 8, 1893, 10.1093/hmg/8.10.1893 · DOI
  12. Watanabe, 2001, J Immunol, 167, 6901, 10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.6901 · DOI
  13. Zhang, 1997, EMBO J, 16, 826, 10.1093/emboj/16.4.826 · DOI
  14. Kozak, 1986, Cell, 44, 283, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Arca, 2002, Lancet, 359, 841, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07955-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Serre, 1990, Hum Genet, 84, 449, 10.1007/BF00195818 · DOI
  17. Slatkin, 2000, Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 1, 225, 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.225 · DOI
  18. Zlotogora, 2002, Lancet, 360, 1024, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11111-1 · DOI
  19. Linton, 1999, J Biol Chem, 274, 19204, 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19204 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Raal, 2000, Atherosclerosis, 150, 421, 10.1016/S0021-9150(99)00435-9 · DOI
  21. Bilheimer, 1983, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 80, 4124, 10.1073/pnas.80.13.4124 · DOI · Paper page
  22. DellAngelica, 2001, Trends Cell Biol, 11, 315, 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02043-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Forman-Kay, 1999, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 9, 690, 10.1016/S0959-440X(99)00031-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. ter Haar, 2000, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 97, 1096, 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1096 · DOI
  25. Laporte, 2002, J Biol Chem, 277, 9247, 10.1074/jbc.M108490200 · DOI
  26. Davis, 1986, Cell, 45, 15, 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90533-7 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Havel, 1988, Hepatology, 8, 1689, 10.1002/hep.1840080637 · DOI
  28. Pathak, 1990, J Cell Biol, 111, 347, 10.1083/jcb.111.2.347 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Eden, 2002, J Clin Invest, 110, 1695, 10.1172/JCI0216445 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, J. C., Kimmel, M., Polanski, A., & Hobbs, H. H.
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2003-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
121-127
ISSN
0957-9672
Cited by
52
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review