Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 399

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Non-catalytic Chitin-binding Protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens Is Essential for Chitin Degradation

Open access
Vaaje-Kolstad, Gustav, Horn, Svein J., van Aalten, Daan M.F., Synstad, Bjørnar, Eijsink, Vincent G.H.·2005·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The Gram-negative soil bacterium Serratia marcescens uses three different family 18 chitinases to degrade chitin, an abundant insoluble carbohydrate polymer composed of beta(1,4)-linked units of N-acetylglucosamine. We show that efficient chitin degradation additionally depends on the action of a small non-catalytic protein, CBP21, which binds to the insoluble crystalline substrate, leading to structural changes in the substrate and increased substrate accessibility. CBP21 strongly promoted hydrolysis of crystalline beta-chitin by chitinases A and C, while it was essential for full degradation by chitinase B. CBP21 variants with single mutations on the largely polar binding surface lost their ability to promote chitin degradation, while retaining considerable affinity for the polymer. Thus, binding alone is not sufficient for CBP21 functionality, which seems to depend on specific, mostly polar interactions between the protein and crystalline chitin. This is the first time a secreted binding protein is shown to assist in the enzymatic degradation of an insoluble carbohydrate via non-hydrolytic disruption of the substrate. Interestingly, homologues of CBP21 occur in most chitin-degrading microorganisms, suggesting a general mechanism by which chitin-binding proteins enhance chitinolytic activity. Homologues also occur in chitinase-containing insect viruses, whose infectiousness is known to depend on chitinase efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m504468200

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Gooday, 1990, Adv. Microb. Ecol., 11, 387, 10.1007/978-1-4684-7612-5_10 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Henrissat, 1991, Biochem. J., 280, 309, 10.1042/bj2800309 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Henrissat, 1997, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7, 637, 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80072-3 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Monreal, 1969, Can. J. Microbiol., 15, 689, 10.1139/m69-122 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fuchs, 1986, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 51, 504, 10.1128/aem.51.3.504-509.1986 · DOI
  6. Brurberg, 1994, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 124, 399, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07315.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb07315.x
  7. Brurberg, 1995, Microbiology-UK, 141, 123, 10.1099/00221287-141-1-123 · doi:10.1099/00221287-141-1-123
  8. Suzuki, 2002, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 66, 1075, 10.1271/bbb.66.1075 · DOI
  9. Boraston, 2004, Biochem. J., 382, 769, 10.1042/BJ20040892 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Suzuki, 1999, Biochem. J., 343, 587, 10.1042/bj3430587 · DOI
  11. Uchiyama, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 41343, 10.1074/jbc.M103610200 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Watanabe, 1994, J. Bacteriol., 176, 4465, 10.1128/jb.176.15.4465-4472.1994 · DOI
  13. Katouno, 2004, J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 136, 163, 10.1093/jb/mvh105 · doi:10.1093/jb/mvh105
  14. Kasprzewska, 2003, Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 8, 809
  15. Harman, 2004, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2, 43, 10.1038/nrmicro797 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kuranda, 1991, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 19758, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55057-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Vinetz, 1999, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 14061, 10.1073/pnas.96.24.14061 · DOI
  18. Schlein, 1992, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 89, 9944, 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9944 · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.20.9944
  19. Hawtin, 1997, Virology, 238, 243, 10.1006/viro.1997.8816 · doi:10.1006/viro.1997.8816
  20. Suzuki, 1998, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 62, 128, 10.1271/bbb.62.128 · DOI
  21. Vaaje-Kolstad, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 11313, 10.1074/jbc.M407175200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Folders, 2000, J. Bacteriol., 182, 1257, 10.1128/JB.182.5.1257-1263.2000 · DOI
  23. Chu, 2001, Microbiology, 147, 1793, 10.1099/00221287-147-7-1793 · DOI
  24. Schnellmann, 1994, Mol. Microbiol., 13, 807, 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00473.x · DOI
  25. Kolbe, 1998, Microbiology-UK, 144, 1291, 10.1099/00221287-144-5-1291 · doi:10.1099/00221287-144-5-1291
  26. Zeltins, 1995, Anal. Biochem., 231, 287, 10.1006/abio.1995.0053 · doi:10.1006/abio.1995.0053
  27. Dall, 2001, Bioessays, 23, 184, 10.1002/1521-1878(200102)23:2<184::AID-BIES1026>3.0.CO;2-H · doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200102)23:2<184::aid-bies1026>3.0.co;2-h
  28. Mitsuhashi, 1998, J. Invertebr. Pathol., 71, 186, 10.1006/jipa.1997.4732 · doi:10.1006/jipa.1997.4732
  29. Hukuhara, 1999, Nat. Biotechnol., 17, 1122, 10.1038/15110 · doi:10.1038/15110
  30. Xu, 1992, J. Invertebr. Pathol., 60, 259, 10.1016/0022-2011(92)90007-Q · doi:10.1016/0022-2011(92)90007-q
  31. Xu, 1994, J. Invertebr. Pathol., 63, 14, 10.1006/jipa.1994.1003 · doi:10.1006/jipa.1994.1003
  32. Li, 2003, Virus Res., 96, 113, 10.1016/S0168-1702(03)00179-5 · doi:10.1016/s0168-1702(03)00179-5
  33. Gao, 2001, Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao (Shanghai), 33, 13
  34. Din, 1991, Biotechnology, 9, 1096, 10.1038/nbt1191-1096 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Din, 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 91, 11383, 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11383 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Saloheimo, 2002, Eur. J. Biochem., 269, 4202, 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03095.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Southall, 1999, FEBS Lett., 447, 58, 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00263-X · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00263-x
  38. Brurberg, 1996, Microbiology-UK, 142, 1581, 10.1099/13500872-142-7-1581 · DOI
  39. Brurberg, 2001, Recent Res. Dev. Microbiol., 5, 187
  40. van Aalten, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 5842, 10.1073/pnas.97.11.5842 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Reese, 1950, J. Bacteriol., 59, 485, 10.1128/jb.59.4.485-497.1950 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Saito, 2002, Biomacromolecules, 3, 407, 10.1021/bm015646d · doi:10.1021/bm015646d
  43. Saito, 2000, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 28, 81, 10.1016/S0141-8130(00)00147-1 · doi:10.1016/s0141-8130(00)00147-1
  44. Watanabe, 1997, J. Bacteriol., 179, 7111, 10.1128/jb.179.22.7111-7117.1997 · doi:10.1128/jb.179.22.7111-7117.1997
  45. Suzuki, 2001, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 65, 338, 10.1271/bbb.65.338 · doi:10.1271/bbb.65.338
  46. Broglie, 1991, Science, 254, 1194, 10.1126/science.254.5035.1194 · DOI
  47. Jach, 1995, Plant J., 8, 97, 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08010097.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.08010097.x
  48. Ding, 1998, Transgenic Res., 7, 77, 10.1023/A:1008820507262 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Hawtin, 1995, Virology, 212, 673, 10.1006/viro.1995.1525 · doi:10.1006/viro.1995.1525
  50. Pijlman, 2003, J. Gen. Virol., 84, 2041, 10.1099/vir.0.19133-0 · doi:10.1099/vir.0.19133-0
  51. Mitsuhashi, 2003, J. Invertebr. Pathol., 82, 34, 10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00203-3 · doi:10.1016/s0022-2011(02)00203-3

Cited by

See all 399

Metadata

Authors
Vaaje-Kolstad, G., Horn, S. J., van Aalten, D. M. F., Synstad, B., & Eijsink, V. G. H.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
280
Issue
31
Pages
28492-28497
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135454635
Cited by
399
References
0
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Non-catalytic Chitin-binding Protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens Is Essential for Chitin Degradation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m504468200
The paper
Vaaje-Kolstad, G., Horn, S. J., van Aalten, D. M. F., Synstad, B., & Eijsink, V. G. H. (2005). The Non-catalytic Chitin-binding Protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens Is Essential for Chitin Degradation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m504468200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.