Cited by 7RNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and diseaseRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Fox-2 splicing factor binds to a conserved intron motif to promote inclusion of protein 4.1R alternative exon 16

Open access
Ponthier, Julie L., Schluepen, Christina, Chen, Weiguo, Lersch, Robert A., Gee, Sherry L., Hou, Victor C., Lo, Annie J., Short, Sarah A. +3 more·2006·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Activation of protein 4.1R exon 16 (E16) inclusion during erythropoiesis represents a physiologically important splicing switch that increases 4.1R affinity for spectrin and actin. Previous studies showed that negative regulation of E16 splicing is mediated by the binding of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A/B proteins to silencer elements in the exon and that down-regulation of hnRNP A/B proteins in erythroblasts leads to activation of E16 inclusion. This article demonstrates that positive regulation of E16 splicing can be mediated by Fox-2 or Fox-1, two closely related splicing factors that possess identical RNA recognition motifs. SELEX experiments with human Fox-1 revealed highly selective binding to the hexamer UGCAUG. Both Fox-1 and Fox-2 were able to bind the conserved UGCAUG elements in the proximal intron downstream of E16, and both could activate E16 splicing in HeLa cell co-transfection assays in a UGCAUG-dependent manner. Conversely, knockdown of Fox-2 expression, achieved with two different siRNA sequences resulted in decreased E16 splicing. Moreover, immunoblot experiments demonstrate mouse erythroblasts express Fox-2. These findings suggest that Fox-2 is a physiological activator of E16 splicing in differentiating erythroid cells in vivo. Recent experiments show that UGCAUG is present in the proximal intron sequence of many tissue-specific alternative exons, and we propose that the Fox family of splicing enhancers plays an important role in alternative splicing switches during differentiation in metazoan organisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m511556200

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hedjran, F., Yeakley, J. M., Huh, G. S., Hynes, R. O., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12343-12347
  2. Yeo, G. W., Van Nostrand, E., Holste, D., Poggio, T., and Burge, C. B. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 2850 -2855

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ponthier, J. L., Schluepen, C., Chen, W., Lersch, R. A., Gee, S. L., Hou, V. C., Lo, A. J., Short, S. A., Chasis, J. A., Winkelmann, J. C., & Conboy, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
Corresponding author
Conboy, John G.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
281
Issue
18
Pages
12468-12474
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1514379483
Cited by
0
References
50
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE-AC03-76SF00098)
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC03- 76SF00098, DK32094)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL045182, HL45182)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P01DK032094, DK32094)
  • Biological and Environmental Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein 4.1R, exon 16, alternative splicing, splicing enhancers, erythropoiesis, erythroblasts, hnRNP A/B, RNA recognition motif, SELEX, cell differentiation
MeSH terms
RNA Splicing Factors, Base Sequence, Blood Proteins, Cell Differentiation, Cytoskeletal Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Erythroblasts, Exons, Gene Expression Regulation, HeLa Cells, Humans, Introns, Membrane Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Repressor Proteins, Transcription Factors, Down-Regulation, RNA-Binding Proteins, Amino Acid Motifs, Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins, RNA, Small Interfering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review