Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hsp90 Recognizes a Common Surface on Client Kinases

Open access
Citri, Ami, Harari, Daniel, Shohat, Galit, Ramakrishnan, Parameswaran, Gan, Judith, Lavi, Sara, Eisenstein, Miriam, Kimchi, Adi, Wallach, David, Pietrokovski, Shmuel, Yarden, Yosef·2006·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Hsp90 is a highly abundant chaperone whose clientele includes hundreds of cellular proteins, many of which are central players in key signal transduction pathways and the majority of which are protein kinases. In light of the variety of Hsp90 clientele, the mechanism of selectivity of the chaperone toward its client proteins is a major open question. Focusing on human kinases, we have demonstrated that the chaperone recognizes a common surface in the amino-terminal lobe of kinases from diverse families, including two newly identified clients, NFkappaB-inducing kinase and death-associated protein kinase, and the oncoprotein HER2/ErbB-2. Surface electrostatics determine the interaction with the Hsp90 chaperone complex such that introduction of a negative charge within this region disrupts recognition. Compiling information on the Hsp90 dependence of 105 protein kinases, including 16 kinases whose relationship to Hsp90 is first examined in this study, reveals that surface features, rather than a contiguous amino acid sequence, define the capacity of the Hsp90 chaperone machine to recognize client kinases. Analyzing Hsp90 regulation of two major signaling cascades, the mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, leads us to propose that the selectivity of the chaperone to specific kinases is functional, namely that Hsp90 controls kinases that function as hubs integrating multiple inputs. These lessons bear significance to pharmacological attempts to target the chaperone in human pathologies, such as cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m512613200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 222

Metadata

Authors
Citri, A., Harari, D., Shohat, G., Ramakrishnan, P., Gan, J., Lavi, S., Eisenstein, M., Kimchi, A., Wallach, D., Pietrokovski, S., & Yarden, Y.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
281
Issue
20
Pages
14361-14369
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095777706
Cited by
222
References
5
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hsp90 Recognizes a Common Surface on Client Kinases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m512613200
The paper
Citri, A., Harari, D., Shohat, G., Ramakrishnan, P., Gan, J., Lavi, S., Eisenstein, M., Kimchi, A., Wallach, D., Pietrokovski, S., & Yarden, Y. (2006). Hsp90 Recognizes a Common Surface on Client Kinases. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m512613200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.