The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Mammalian Ribonucleotide Reduction and dNTP Pools after DNA Damage and in Resting Cells
Open accessAbstract
Ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) provides the cell with a balanced supply of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTP) for DNA synthesis. In budding yeast DNA damage leads to an up-regulation of RNR activity and an increase in dNTP pools, which are essential for survival. Mammalian cells contain three non-identical subunits of RNR; that is, one homodimeric large subunit, R1, carrying the catalytic site and two variants of the homodimeric small subunit, R2 and the p53-inducible p53R2, each containing a tyrosyl free radical essential for catalysis. S-phase-specific DNA replication is supported by an RNR consisting of the R1 and R2 subunits. In contrast, DNA damage induces expression of the R1 and the p53R2 subunits. We now show that neither logarithmically growing nor G(o)/G1-synchronized mammalian cells show any major increase in their dNTP pools after DNA damage. However, non-dividing fibroblasts expressing the p53R2 protein, but not the R2 protein, have reduced dNTP levels if exposed to the RNR-specific inhibitor hydroxyurea, strongly indicating that there is ribonucleotide reduction in resting cells. The slow, 4-fold increase in p53R2 protein expression after DNA damage results in a less than 2-fold increase in the dNTP pools in G(o)/G1 cells, where the pools are about 5% that of the size of the pools in S-phase cells. Our results emphasize the importance of the low constitutive levels of p53R2 in mammalian cells, which together with low levels of R1 protein may be essential for the supply of dNTPs for basal levels of DNA repair and mitochondrial DNA synthesis in G(o)/G1 cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
Beckman, K. B., & Ames, B. N. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.32.19633 · Cited by 951
A ribonucleotide reductase gene involved in a p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint for DNA damage
Tanaka, H., Arakawa, H., Yamaguchi, T., Shiraishi, K., Fukuda, S., Matsui, K., Takei, Y., & Nakamura, Y. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35003506 · Cited by 904
DNA damage responses to oxidative stress
Barzilai, A., & Yamamoto, K.-I. (2004) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.002 · Cited by 796
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN DEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE AND DNA SYNTHESIS
Reichard, P. (1988) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.57.070188.002025 · Cited by 779
Spector, D. L., Goldman, R. D., & Leinwand, L. A. (1998) · Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · Cited by 636
Huang, M., Zhou, Z., & Elledge, S. J. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81601-3 · Cited by 507
A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint
Melo, J., & Toczyski, D. (2002) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(02)00312-5 · Cited by 457
Chabes, A., Georgieva, B., Domkin, V., Zhao, X., Rothstein, R., & Thelander, L. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00075-8 · Cited by 436
Self-citation(2005) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780849346071 · Cited by 304
Cited by
Purhonen, J., Banerjee, R., McDonald, A. E., Fellman, V., & Kallijärvi, J. (2020) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa516 · Cited by 657
“Basal dNTP levels in non-proliferating or postmitotic cells are only ∼5% that of in cells in S phase and are mainly required for DNA repair and maintenance of mitochondrial DNA (1,2).”
BackgroundBourdon, A., Minai, L., Serre, V., Jais, J.-P., Sarzi, E., Aubert, S., Chrétien, D., de Lonlay, P., Paquis-Flucklinger, V., Arakawa, H., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2040 · Cited by 531
DNA precursor metabolism and genomic stability
Mathews, C. K. (2006) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.06-5730rev · Cited by 311
Aird, K. M., Zhang, G., Li, H., Tu, Z., Bitler, B. G., Garipov, A., Wu, H., Wei, Z., Wagner, S. N., Herlyn, M., et al. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.004 · Cited by 285
DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation
Sirbu, B. M., & Cortez, D. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012724 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Håkansson, P., Hofer, A., & Thelander, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7834-7841
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012914676
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulation of Mammalian Ribonucleotide Reduction and dNTP Pools after DNA Damage and in Resting Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m512894200
- The paper
- Håkansson, P., Hofer, A., & Thelander, L. (2006). Regulation of Mammalian Ribonucleotide Reduction and dNTP Pools after DNA Damage and in Resting Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m512894200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.