Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response in Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Association of Protein-disulfide Isomerase with Superoxide Dismutase 1

Open access
Atkin, Julie D., Farg, Manal A., Turner, Bradley J., Tomas, Doris, Lysaght, Judith A., Nunan, Janelle, Rembach, Alan, Nagley, Phillip, Beart, Philip M., Cheema, Surindar S., Horne, Malcolm K.·2006·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD1) are linked to motor neuron death in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by an unclear mechanism, although misfolded SOD1 aggregates are commonly associated with disease. Proteomic analysis of the transgenic SOD1(G93A) ALS rat model revealed significant up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI) family members in lumbar spinal cords. Expression of SOD1 mutants (mSOD1) led to an up-regulation of PDI in motor neuron-like NSC-34 cells but not other cell lines. Inhibition of PDI using bacitracin increased aggregate production, even in wild type SOD1 transfectants that do not readily form inclusions, suggesting PDI may protect SOD1 from aggregation. Moreover, PDI co-localized with intracellular aggregates of mSOD1 and bound to both wild type and mSOD1. SOD1 was also found in the microsomal fraction of cells despite being a predominantly cytosolic enzyme, confirming ER-Golgi-dependent secretion. In SOD1(G93A) mice, a significant up-regulation of unfolded protein response entities was also observed during disease, including caspase-12, -9, and -3 cleavage. Our findings therefore implicate unfolded protein response and ER stress-induced apoptosis in the patho-physiology of familial ALS. The possibility that PDI may be a therapeutic target to prevent SOD1 aggregation is also raised by this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m603393200This paper is marked retracted.

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Atkin, J. D., Farg, M. A., Turner, B. J., Tomas, D., Lysaght, J. A., Nunan, J., Rembach, A., Nagley, P., Beart, P. M., Cheema, S. S., & Horne, M. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
281
Issue
40
Pages
30152-30165
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099846110
Cited by
279
References
3
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Status
Retracted
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response in Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Association of Protein-disulfide Isomerase with Superoxide Dismutase 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/jbc.m603393200
The paper
Atkin, J. D., Farg, M. A., Turner, B. J., Tomas, D., Lysaght, J. A., Nunan, J., Rembach, A., Nagley, P., Beart, P. M., Cheema, S. S., & Horne, M. K. (2006). Induction of the Unfolded Protein Response in Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Association of Protein-disulfide Isomerase with Superoxide Dismutase 1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m603393200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.