Cited by 153

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Amino-terminal Dimerization, NRDP1-Rhodanese Interaction, and Inhibited Catalytic Domain Conformation of the Ubiquitin-specific Protease 8 (USP8)

Avvakumov, George V., Walker, John R., Xue, Sheng, Finerty, Patrick J., Mackenzie, Farrell, Newman, Elena M., Dhe-Paganon, Sirano·2006·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) hydrolyzes mono and polyubiquitylated targets such as epidermal growth factor receptors and is involved in clathrin-mediated internalization. In 1182 residues, USP8 contains multiple domains, including coiled-coil, rhodanese, and catalytic domains. We report the first high-resolution crystal structures of these domains and discuss their implications for USP8 function. The amino-terminal domain is a homodimer with a novel fold. It is composed of two five-helix bundles, where the first helices are swapped, and carboxyl-terminal helices are extended in an antiparallel fashion. The structure of the rhodanese domain, determined in complex with the E3 ligase NRDP1, reveals the canonical rhodanese fold but with a distorted primordial active site. The USP8 recognition domain of NRDP1 has a novel protein fold that interacts with a conserved peptide loop of the rhodanese domain. A consensus sequence of this loop is found in other NRDP1 targets, suggesting a common mode of interaction. The structure of the carboxyl-terminal catalytic domain of USP8 exhibits the conserved tripartite architecture but shows unique traits. Notably, the active site, including the ubiquitin binding pocket, is in a closed conformation, incompatible with substrate binding. The presence of a zinc ribbon subdomain near the ubiquitin binding site further suggests a polyubiquitin-specific binding site and a mechanism for substrate induced conformational changes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m606704200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Hershko, 1998, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 425, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aguilar, 2003, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 15, 184, 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00010-3 · DOI
  3. Hochstrasser, 1996, Cell, 84, 813, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81058-2 · DOI
  4. Aguilar, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 2679, 10.1073/pnas.0500213102 · DOI
  5. Amerik, 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 3365, 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3365 · DOI
  6. Dupre, 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 4482, 10.1128/MCB.21.14.4482-4494.2001 · DOI
  7. Mizuno, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0560 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kato, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 37481, 10.1074/jbc.M007251200 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kaneko, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 48162, 10.1074/jbc.M306677200 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Chubb, 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 709, 10.1242/jcs.113.4.709 · DOI
  11. Gnesutta, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 39448, 10.1074/jbc.M103454200 · DOI
  12. Qiu, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 14843, 10.1073/pnas.232580999 · DOI
  13. Diamonti, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 2866, 10.1073/pnas.052709799 · DOI
  14. Wu, 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 7748, 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7748-7757.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Otwinkowski, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 276, 307, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X · DOI · Paper page
  16. Terwilliger, 1999, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 55, 849, 10.1107/S0907444999000839 · DOI
  17. Terwilliger, 2000, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 56, 965, 10.1107/S0907444900005072 · DOI
  18. Terwilliger, 2002, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 58, 1937, 10.1107/S0907444902016438 · DOI
  19. Perrakis, 1999, Nat. Struct. Biol., 6, 458, 10.1038/8263 · DOI
  20. Project, 1994, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 50, 760, 10.1107/S0907444994003112 · DOI
  21. Jones, 1991, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A, 47, 110, 10.1107/S0108767390010224 · DOI
  22. Painter, 2006, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 39, 109, 10.1107/S0021889805038987 · DOI
  23. Laskowski, 1993, J. Applied Crystallography, 26, 283, 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mccoy, 2005, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 61, 458, 10.1107/S0907444905001617 · DOI
  25. Dang, 1998, Biochemistry, 37, 1868, 10.1021/bi9723360 · DOI
  26. Wolf, 1997, Protein Sci., 6, 1179, 10.1002/pro.5560060606 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Gent, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 9858, 10.1073/pnas.152294299 · DOI
  28. Lee, 2005, FEBS Lett., 579, 4867, 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.07.048 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2002, Cell, 111, 209, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01012-7 · DOI
  30. McCullough, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 487, 10.1083/jcb.200401141 · DOI
  31. Krishna, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 532, 10.1093/nar/gkg161 · DOI
  32. Hu, 2002, Cell, 111, 1041, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01199-6 · DOI
  33. Hu, 2005, EMBO J., 24, 3747, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600832 · DOI
  34. Das, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 4675, 10.1073/pnas.0510403103 · DOI
  35. Johnston, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 3787, 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3787 · DOI
  36. Barretto, 2005, J. Virol., 79, 15189, 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15189-15198.2005 · DOI
  37. Ratia, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 5717, 10.1073/pnas.0510851103 · DOI
  38. Renatus, 2006, Structure (Camb.), 14, 1293, 10.1016/j.str.2006.06.012 · DOI
  39. Qiu, 2004, EMBO J., 23, 800, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600075 · DOI
  40. Swaminathan, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 2583, 10.1091/mbc.10.8.2583 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Avvakumov, G. V., Walker, J. R., Xue, S., Finerty, P. J., Mackenzie, F., Newman, E. M., & Dhe-Paganon, S.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
281
Issue
49
Pages
38061-38070
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
153
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review