The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amino-terminal Dimerization, NRDP1-Rhodanese Interaction, and Inhibited Catalytic Domain Conformation of the Ubiquitin-specific Protease 8 (USP8)
Abstract
Ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) hydrolyzes mono and polyubiquitylated targets such as epidermal growth factor receptors and is involved in clathrin-mediated internalization. In 1182 residues, USP8 contains multiple domains, including coiled-coil, rhodanese, and catalytic domains. We report the first high-resolution crystal structures of these domains and discuss their implications for USP8 function. The amino-terminal domain is a homodimer with a novel fold. It is composed of two five-helix bundles, where the first helices are swapped, and carboxyl-terminal helices are extended in an antiparallel fashion. The structure of the rhodanese domain, determined in complex with the E3 ligase NRDP1, reveals the canonical rhodanese fold but with a distorted primordial active site. The USP8 recognition domain of NRDP1 has a novel protein fold that interacts with a conserved peptide loop of the rhodanese domain. A consensus sequence of this loop is found in other NRDP1 targets, suggesting a common mode of interaction. The structure of the carboxyl-terminal catalytic domain of USP8 exhibits the conserved tripartite architecture but shows unique traits. Notably, the active site, including the ubiquitin binding pocket, is in a closed conformation, incompatible with substrate binding. The presence of a zinc ribbon subdomain near the ubiquitin binding site further suggests a polyubiquitin-specific binding site and a mechanism for substrate induced conformational changes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The N-terminal DUF1873 of USP8 constitutes a structurally atypical MIT domain.
“The N-terminal domain of unknown function (DUF) 1873 of USP8 reportedly constitutes a structurally atypical low homology microtubule interacting and transport (MIT) domain (32,33)”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [33]
The Rhodanese-like domain of USP8 binds E3 ligase Nrdp1 and indirectly influences degradation of Erb-B3.
“the rhodanese-like domain (Rhod) of USP8 is known to bind the E3 ligase, Nrdp1, and in so doing indirectly influences the degradation of Erb-B3 (33,36,37).”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [33]
The MIT domain of USP8 interacts in vitro with CHMP-1A/B components of ESCRT-III.
“which has been shown to interact in vitro with the CHMP-1A/B protein components of the late endosomal sorting complex, ESCRT-III.”
From Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ubiquitination and Trafficking by the USP8·STAM Complex (2010) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Hershko, 1998, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 425, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.425 · DOI · Paper page
- Aguilar, 2003, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 15, 184, 10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00010-3 · DOI
- Hochstrasser, 1996, Cell, 84, 813, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81058-2 · DOI
- Aguilar, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 2679, 10.1073/pnas.0500213102 · DOI
- Amerik, 2000, Mol. Biol. Cell, 11, 3365, 10.1091/mbc.11.10.3365 · DOI
- Dupre, 2001, Mol. Cell. Biol., 21, 4482, 10.1128/MCB.21.14.4482-4494.2001 · DOI
- Mizuno, 2005, Mol. Biol. Cell, 16, 5163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0560 · DOI · Paper page
- Kato, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 37481, 10.1074/jbc.M007251200 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaneko, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 48162, 10.1074/jbc.M306677200 · DOI · Paper page
- Chubb, 2000, J. Cell Sci., 113, 709, 10.1242/jcs.113.4.709 · DOI
- Gnesutta, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 39448, 10.1074/jbc.M103454200 · DOI
- Qiu, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 14843, 10.1073/pnas.232580999 · DOI
- Diamonti, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 2866, 10.1073/pnas.052709799 · DOI
- Wu, 2004, Mol. Cell. Biol., 24, 7748, 10.1128/MCB.24.17.7748-7757.2004 · DOI · Paper page
- Otwinkowski, 1997, Methods Enzymol., 276, 307, 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X · DOI · Paper page
- Terwilliger, 1999, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 55, 849, 10.1107/S0907444999000839 · DOI
- Terwilliger, 2000, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 56, 965, 10.1107/S0907444900005072 · DOI
- Terwilliger, 2002, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 58, 1937, 10.1107/S0907444902016438 · DOI
- Perrakis, 1999, Nat. Struct. Biol., 6, 458, 10.1038/8263 · DOI
- Project, 1994, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 50, 760, 10.1107/S0907444994003112 · DOI
- Jones, 1991, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A, 47, 110, 10.1107/S0108767390010224 · DOI
- Painter, 2006, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 39, 109, 10.1107/S0021889805038987 · DOI
- Laskowski, 1993, J. Applied Crystallography, 26, 283, 10.1107/S0021889892009944 · DOI · Paper page
- Mccoy, 2005, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 61, 458, 10.1107/S0907444905001617 · DOI
- Dang, 1998, Biochemistry, 37, 1868, 10.1021/bi9723360 · DOI
- Wolf, 1997, Protein Sci., 6, 1179, 10.1002/pro.5560060606 · DOI · Paper page
- Gent, 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99, 9858, 10.1073/pnas.152294299 · DOI
- Lee, 2005, FEBS Lett., 579, 4867, 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.07.048 · DOI
- Liu, 2002, Cell, 111, 209, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01012-7 · DOI
- McCullough, 2004, J. Cell Biol., 166, 487, 10.1083/jcb.200401141 · DOI
- Krishna, 2003, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 532, 10.1093/nar/gkg161 · DOI
- Hu, 2002, Cell, 111, 1041, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01199-6 · DOI
- Hu, 2005, EMBO J., 24, 3747, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600832 · DOI
- Das, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 4675, 10.1073/pnas.0510403103 · DOI
- Johnston, 1997, EMBO J., 16, 3787, 10.1093/emboj/16.13.3787 · DOI
- Barretto, 2005, J. Virol., 79, 15189, 10.1128/JVI.79.24.15189-15198.2005 · DOI
- Ratia, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 5717, 10.1073/pnas.0510851103 · DOI
- Renatus, 2006, Structure (Camb.), 14, 1293, 10.1016/j.str.2006.06.012 · DOI
- Qiu, 2004, EMBO J., 23, 800, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600075 · DOI
- Swaminathan, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 2583, 10.1091/mbc.10.8.2583 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes.
Reyes-Turcu, F. E., Ventii, K. H., & Wilkinson, K. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.082307.091526 · Cited by 1,396
Molecular basis of USP7 inhibition by selective small-molecule inhibitors.
Turnbull, A. P., Ioannidis, S., Krajewski, W. W., Pinto-Fernandez, A., Heride, C., Martin, A. C. L., Tonkin, L. M., Townsend, E. C., Buker, S. M., Lancia, D. R., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24451 · Cited by 463
USP7: Structure, substrate specificity, and inhibition
Pozhidaeva, A., & Bezsonova, I. (2019) · DNA Repair · doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.005 · Cited by 178
Berlin, I., Schwartz, H., & Nash, P. D. (2010) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.016287 · Cited by 121
Pozhidaeva, A., Valles, G., Wang, F., Wu, J., Sterner, D. E., Nguyen, P., Weinstock, J., Kumar, K. G. S., Kanyo, J., Wright, D., et al. (2017) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.004 · Cited by 107
Fernández‐Montalván, A., Bouwmeester, T., Joberty, G., Mader, R., Mahnke, M., Pierrat, B., Schlaeppi, J., Worpenberg, S., & Gerhartz, B. (2007) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05952.x · Cited by 96
Qin, X., Wang, R., Xu, H., Tu, L., Chen, H., Li, H., Liu, N., Wang, J., Li, S., Yin, F., et al. (2022) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2021.2022360 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Avvakumov, G. V., Walker, J. R., Xue, S., Finerty, P. J., Mackenzie, F., Newman, E. M., & Dhe-Paganon, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 281
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 38061-38070
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review