Cited by 128Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAmino Acid Enzymes and MetabolismIon Transport and Channel Regulation

Cytoskeletal Anchoring of GLAST Determines Susceptibility to Brain Damage

Open access
Sullivan, Susan M., Lee, Aven, Björkman, S. Tracey, Miller, Stephanie M., Sullivan, Robert K.P., Poronnik, Philip, Colditz, Paul B., Pow, David V.·2007·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an enigmatic protein; it currently has no unambiguously defined role. It is expressed in the cytoskeleton of astrocytes in the mammalian brain. We have used co-immunoprecipitation to identify in vivo binding partners for GFAP in the rat and pig brain. We demonstrate interactions between GFAP, the glutamate transporter GLAST, the PDZ-binding protein NHERF1, and ezrin. These interactions are physiologically relevant; we demonstrate in vitro that transport of D-aspartate (a glutamate analogue) is significantly increased in the presence of GFAP and NHERF1. Moreover, we demonstrate in vivo that expression of GFAP is essential in retaining GLAST in the plasma membranes of astrocytes after an hypoxic insult. These data indicate that the cytoskeleton of the astrocyte plays an important role in protecting the brain against glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m704152200

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, S. M., Lee, A., Björkman, S. T., Miller, S. M., Sullivan, R. K. P., Poronnik, P., Colditz, P. B., & Pow, D. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Pow, David V.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
282
Issue
40
Pages
29414-29423
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041340250
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
glial fibrillary acidic protein, GLAST, glutamate transporters, NHERF1, ezrin, protein-protein interaction, hypoxia, excitotoxicity, brain damage, plasma membrane retention
MeSH terms
Ezrin, Animals, Biological Transport, Brain, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Cytoskeleton, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Swine, Transfection, D-Aspartic Acid, Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 1, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review