Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eight-channel iTRAQ Enables Comparison of the Activity of Six Leukemogenic Tyrosine Kinases

Open access
Pierce, Andrew, Unwin, Richard D., Evans, Caroline A., Griffiths, Stephen, Carney, Louise, Zhang, Liqun, Jaworska, Ewa, Lee, Chia-Fang, Blinco, David, Okoniewski, Michal J., Miller, Crispin J., Bitton, Danny A., Spooncer, Elaine, Whetton, Anthony D.·2008·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Abstract

There are a number of leukemogenic protein-tyrosine kinases (PTKs) associated with leukemic transformation. Although each is linked with a specific disease their functional activity poses the question whether they have a degree of commonality in their effects upon target cells. Exon array analysis of the effects of six leukemogenic PTKs (BCR/ABL, TEL/PDGFRbeta, FIP1/PDGFRalpha, D816V KIT, NPM/ALK, and FLT3ITD) revealed few common effects on the transcriptome. It is apparent, however, that proteome changes are not directly governed by transcriptome changes. Therefore, we assessed and used a new generation of iTRAQ tagging, enabling eight-channel relative quantification discovery proteomics, to analyze the effects of these six leukemogenic PTKs. Again these were found to have disparate effects on the proteome with few common targets. BCR/ABL had the greatest effect on the proteome and had more effects in common with FIP1/PDGFRalpha. The proteomic effects of the four type III receptor kinases were relatively remotely related. The only protein commonly affected was eosinophil-associated ribonuclease 7. Five of six PTKs affected the motility-related proteins CAPG and vimentin, although this did not correspond to changes in motility. However, correlation of the proteomics data with that from the exon microarray not only showed poor levels of correlation between transcript and protein levels but also revealed alternative patterns of regulation of the CAPG protein by different oncogenes, illustrating the utility of such a combined approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.m700251-mcp200

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Pierce, A., Unwin, R. D., Evans, C. A., Griffiths, S., Carney, L., Zhang, L., Jaworska, E., Lee, C.-F., Blinco, D., Okoniewski, M. J., Miller, C. J., Bitton, D. A., Spooncer, E., & Whetton, A. D.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
853-863
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148365034
Cited by
255
References
35
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eight-channel iTRAQ Enables Comparison of the Activity of Six Leukemogenic Tyrosine Kinases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m700251-mcp200
The paper
Pierce, A., Unwin, R. D., Evans, C. A., Griffiths, S., Carney, L., Zhang, L., Jaworska, E., Lee, C.-F., Blinco, D., Okoniewski, M. J., Miller, C. J., Bitton, D. A., Spooncer, E., & Whetton, A. D. (2008). Eight-channel iTRAQ Enables Comparison of the Activity of Six Leukemogenic Tyrosine Kinases. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m700251-mcp200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.