Cited by 299Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics

Open access
Pappireddi, Nishant, Martin, Lance, Wühr, Martin·2019·ChemBioChem

Abstract

Over the last few decades, mass spectrometry‐based proteomics has become an increasingly powerful tool that is now able to routinely detect and quantify thousands of proteins. A major advance for global protein quantification was the introduction of isobaric tags, which, in a single experiment, enabled the global quantification of proteins across multiple samples. Herein, these methods are referred to as multiplexed proteomics. The principles, advantages, and drawbacks of various multiplexed proteomics techniques are discussed and compared with alternative approaches. We also discuss how the emerging combination of multiplexing with targeted proteomics might enable the reliable and high‐quality quantification of very low abundance proteins across multiple conditions. Lastly, we suggest that fusing multiplexed proteomics with data‐independent acquisition approaches might enable the comparison of hundreds of different samples without missing values, while maintaining the superb measurement precision and accuracy obtainable with isobaric tag quantification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cbic.201800650

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major developments in mass spectrometry-based, antibody-based and aptamer-based proteomics over the past decade have enabled the robust quantification of thousands of proteins in single samples.

    “Major developments in mass spectrometry-based, antibody-based and aptamer-based proteomics over the past decade have enabled the robust quantification of thousands of proteins in single samples87–90.”

    From Measuring biological age using omics data (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 106 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marshall AG, Wang TCL, Ricca TL, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1985, 107, 7893– 7897; b McLafferty FW, Stauffer DB, Loh SY, Williams ER, Analytical Chemistry 1987, 59, 2212– 2213; c Chen L, Marshall AG, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes 1987, 79, 115– 125; d Schwartz JC, Senko MW, Syka JE, J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2002, 13, 659– 669. 12056566

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pappireddi, N., Martin, L., & Wühr, M.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Wühr, Martin
Venue
ChemBioChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-18
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
1210-1224
ISSN
  • 1439-4227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-7633
OpenAlex
W2908241150
Cited by
299
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemBioChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1R35GM128813, T32GM007388)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0018420, DE-SC0018260)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
multiplexed proteomics, quantitative proteomics, isobaric tags, targeted proteomics, low-abundance proteins, data-independent acquisition, mass spectrometry
MeSH terms
Humans, Isotope Labeling, Proteins, Proteome, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review