The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Efficient Classification and Identification of Human Pathogenic Bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS
Open accessAbstract
Accurate and rapid identification of pathogenic microorganisms is of critical importance in disease treatment and public health. Conventional work flows are time-consuming, and procedures are multifaceted. MS can be an alternative but is limited by low efficiency for amino acid sequencing as well as low reproducibility for spectrum fingerprinting. We systematically analyzed the feasibility of applying MS for rapid and accurate bacterial identification. Directly applying bacterial colonies without further protein extraction to MALDI-TOF MS analysis revealed rich peak contents and high reproducibility. The MS spectra derived from 57 isolates comprising six human pathogenic bacterial species were analyzed using both unsupervised hierarchical clustering and supervised model construction via the Genetic Algorithm. Hierarchical clustering analysis categorized the spectra into six groups precisely corresponding to the six bacterial species. Precise classification was also maintained in an independently prepared set of bacteria even when the numbers of m/z values were reduced to six. In parallel, classification models were constructed via Genetic Algorithm analysis. A model containing 18 m/z values accurately classified independently prepared bacteria and identified those species originally not used for model construction. Moreover bacteria fewer than 10(4) cells and different species in bacterial mixtures were identified using the classification model approach. In conclusion, the application of MALDI-TOF MS in combination with a suitable model construction provides a highly accurate method for bacterial classification and identification. The approach can identify bacteria with low abundance even in mixed flora, suggesting that a rapid and accurate bacterial identification using MS techniques even before culture can be attained in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seng, P., Drancourt, M., Gouriet, F., La Scola, B., Fournier, P., Rolain, J. M., & Raoult, D. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/600885 · Cited by 1,983
Norris, J. L., & Caprioli, R. M. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004295 · Cited by 696
Mass spectrometry tools for the classification and identification of bacteria
Sauer, S., & Kliem, M. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2243 · Cited by 461
MALDI-TOF-Mass Spectrometry Applications in Clinical Microbiology
Seng, P., Rolain, J.-M., Fournier, P. E., La Scola, B., Drancourt, M., & Raoult, D. (2010) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.10.127 · Cited by 419
Bacterial and fungal microflora in surgically removed lung cancer samples
Apostolou, P., Tsantsaridou, A., Papasotiriou, I., Toloudi, M., Chatziioannou, M., & Giamouzis, G. (2011) · Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery · doi:10.1186/1749-8090-6-137 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, S.-Y., Tseng, C.-L., Lee, Y.-S., Kuo, A.-J., Sun, C.-F., Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, J.-K.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 448-456
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131574268
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Efficient Classification and Identification of Human Pathogenic Bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m700339-mcp200
- The paper
- Hsieh, S.-Y., Tseng, C.-L., Lee, Y.-S., Kuo, A.-J., Sun, C.-F., Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, J.-K. (2008). Highly Efficient Classification and Identification of Human Pathogenic Bacteria by MALDI-TOF MS. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m700339-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.