Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 226

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Urinary Proteomic Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease

Open access
Zimmerli, Lukas U., Schiffer, Eric, Zürbig, Petra, Good, David M., Kellmann, Markus, Mouls, Laetitia, Pitt, Andrew R., Coon, Joshua J., Schmieder, Roland E., Peter, Karlheinz H., Mischak, Harald, Kolch, Walter, Delles, Christian, Dominiczak, Anna F.·2008·Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Abstract

Urinary proteomics is emerging as a powerful non-invasive tool for diagnosis and monitoring of variety of human diseases. We tested whether signatures of urinary polypeptides can contribute to the existing biomarkers for coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined a total of 359 urine samples from 88 patients with severe CAD and 282 controls. Spot urine was analyzed using capillary electrophoresis on-line coupled to ESI-TOF-MS enabling characterization of more than 1000 polypeptides per sample. In a first step a "training set" for biomarker definition was created. Multiple biomarker patterns clearly distinguished healthy controls from CAD patients, and we extracted 15 peptides that define a characteristic CAD signature panel. In a second step, the ability of the CAD-specific panel to predict the presence of CAD was evaluated in a blinded study using a "test set." The signature panel showed sensitivity of 98% (95% confidence interval, 88.7-99.6) and 83% specificity (95% confidence interval, 51.6-97.4). Furthermore the peptide pattern significantly changed toward the healthy signature correlating with the level of physical activity after therapeutic intervention. Our results show that urinary proteomics can identify CAD patients with high confidence and might also play a role in monitoring the effects of therapeutic interventions. The workflow is amenable to clinical routine testing suggesting that non-invasive proteomics analysis can become a valuable addition to other biomarkers used in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/mcp.m700394-mcp200

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 226

Metadata

Authors
Zimmerli, L. U., Schiffer, E., Zürbig, P., Good, D. M., Kellmann, M., Mouls, L., Pitt, A. R., Coon, J. J., Schmieder, R. E., Peter, K. H., Mischak, H., Kolch, W., Delles, C., & Dominiczak, A. F.
Venue
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
290-298
ISSN
1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992136146
Cited by
226
References
4
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary Proteomic Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.m700394-mcp200
The paper
Zimmerli, L. U., Schiffer, E., Zürbig, P., Good, D. M., Kellmann, M., Mouls, L., Pitt, A. R., Coon, J. J., Schmieder, R. E., Peter, K. H., Mischak, H., Kolch, W., Delles, C., & Dominiczak, A. F. (2008). Urinary Proteomic Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m700394-mcp200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.