The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing Accuracy and Precision Issues in iTRAQ Quantitation
Open accessAbstract
iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative or absolute quantitation) is a mass spectrometry technology that allows quantitative comparison of protein abundance by measuring peak intensities of reporter ions released from iTRAQ-tagged peptides by fragmentation during MS/MS. However, current for iTRAQ relative protein abundance of of is by relative abundance peptides is of a that a protein for protein or that from during a a that a from that is iTRAQ of iTRAQ or for peak intensities that a is of of of of iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative or absolute quantitation) is a mass spectrometry technology that allows quantitative comparison of protein abundance by measuring peak intensities of reporter ions released from iTRAQ-tagged peptides by fragmentation during MS/MS. However, current for iTRAQ relative protein abundance of of is by relative abundance peptides is of a that a protein for protein or that from during a a that a from that is iTRAQ of iTRAQ or for peak intensities that a is of of of of of quantitative comparison of for quantitative of relative of mass spectrometry of of by or mass of protein by mass for of a for that a of quantitative or a is of or peptides is relative of of mass tags of by mass a for of protein by or tags for relative or absolute tags for relative or absolute of of protein for of from of quantitative intensities of iTRAQ reporter ions fragmentation of peptides a mass of tags is by a reporter ions reporter from peptides during iTRAQ a of from of iTRAQ of of a of of a for protein from is that protein from of peptides However, of of protein of of a protein or that of is that of protein abundance from by mass for that a abundance by from peptides abundance for a for for a protein is comparison of of iTRAQ that for a protein a protein protein tags comparison of protein tags for relative absolute a for protein or iTRAQ mass of of of of a of from of of is by by is by that of iTRAQ protein a for protein by a protein a for protein that iTRAQ iTRAQ mass of a mass protein by of a comparison of mass iTRAQ that from peptides during during iTRAQ mass iTRAQ of a reporter tags for iTRAQ a of iTRAQ reporter iTRAQ of that is of of is from from of a of a for protein iTRAQ mass from for for protein spectrometry of for for mass spectrometry quantitative a from that from of measuring of of mass for for protein spectrometry of a of of for a of current comparison of of protein by of a tags for relative absolute a for protein of a of a for protein protein iTRAQ mass for a for is protein is from of for peptides for a a for iTRAQ of a of protein a for protein that a that is of a that of by of of of that that of is for of iTRAQ of iTRAQ peak iTRAQ of of for protein a a protein abundance of a of of of a a of a of is iTRAQ for of by of tags for for iTRAQ a of of of of for a iTRAQ from of a of of for reporter a of peptides of peptides or protein of of is peptides for of peptides is a of a for iTRAQ relative comparison reporter peak peak from fragmentation is of reporter mass of is peptides of by reporter or or of reporter peak intensities fragmentation is by for peptides reporter peak intensities fragmentation tags is iTRAQ fragmentation of reporter for relative of peptides from of a of that of of of of a of of is intensities of iTRAQ a of a of a tags for relative absolute for iTRAQ of of protein tags for relative absolute However, that for tags for for a is is a a of a of of of a by is a a is of or of is of is of of is a that is for of of of a peak intensities a is a of of is absolute is of of or of of allows a for or that or of of is of is of is a of of a of tags for relative absolute However, of of that of by is of or of is that of comparison for for of is that However, is a peptides is from a that of for that of of of by by iTRAQ released of peptides a a reporter ions during of tags of protein that is iTRAQ of of tags for for that protein a is a relative abundance for of for of a of a protein a a a peptides from for a by by a of a that of peptides a of by for peptides that that from from that a or a that a for a is is from from from a a protein a of of a for for of for a peptides that of by for for that a for a protein is of of is a of for that is a for that of intensities of for of peptides from a of a for or a of reporter ions a of for quantitative for from a for of peak intensities of peptides for abundance of protein of is that a that for by of by that is by from current by of protein of protein abundance a protein from of protein abundance of of of for protein a a from for a of peptides for a protein a iTRAQ is a comparison a comparison of of tags for relative absolute quantitative for from tags iTRAQ mass protein is a is that of a that of of that of a of a of protein is that a a is of of protein protein by a for a peptides for a protein of protein that or of for for for a a from a of a of from by protein for by for of by or of by of a from comparison of for for a protein protein from peptides that that by from of
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags
Gygi, S. P., Rist, B., Gerber, S. A., Turecek, F., Gelb, M. H., & Aebersold, R. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/13690 · Cited by 4,683
Huber, W., von Heydebreck, A., Sültmann, H., Poustka, A., & Vingron, M. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s96 · Cited by 2,440
Self-citationGrowth control of the eukaryote cell: a systems biology study in yeast
Castrillo, J. I., Zeef, L. A., Hoyle, D. C., Zhang, N., Hayes, A., Gardner, D. C., Cornell, M. J., Petty, J., Hakes, L., Wardleworth, L., et al. (2007) · Journal of Biology · doi:10.1186/jbiol54 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
McAlister, G. C., Nusinow, D. P., Jedrychowski, M. P., Wühr, M., Huttlin, E. L., Erickson, B. K., Rad, R., Haas, W., & Gygi, S. P. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac502040v · Cited by 1,263
MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics
Ting, L., Rad, R., Gygi, S. P., & Haas, W. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1714 · Cited by 1,009
Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present
Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6203-4 · Cited by 801
Variation and genetic control of protein abundance in humans
Wu, L., Candille, S. I., Choi, Y., Xie, D., Jiang, L., Li-Pook-Than, J., Tang, H., & Snyder, M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12223 · Cited by 364
A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics
Pappireddi, N., Martin, L., & Wühr, M. (2019) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.201800650 · Cited by 299
Thermal proteome profiling for interrogating protein interactions
Mateus, A., Kurzawa, N., Becher, I., Sridharan, S., Helm, D., Stein, F., Typas, A., & Savitski, M. M. (2020) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20199232 · Cited by 258
Cancer proteogenomics: current impact and future prospects
Mani, D. R., Krug, K., Zhang, B., Satpathy, S., Clauser, K. R., Ding, L., Ellis, M., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00446-5 · Cited by 229
Wang, H., Alvarez, S., & Hicks, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr2008225 · Cited by 142
Riga, D., Kramvis, I., Koskinen, M. K., van Bokhoven, P., van der Harst, J. E., Heistek, T. S., Jaap Timmerman, A., van Nierop, P., van der Schors, R. C., Pieneman, A. W., et al. (2017) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8753 · Cited by 128
Niu, M., Cho, J.-H., Kodali, K., Pagala, V., High, A. A., Wang, H., Wu, Z., Li, Y., Bi, W., Zhang, H., et al. (2017) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04415 · Cited by 118
Systematic Identification of the HSP90 Regulated Proteome
Wu, Z., Moghaddas Gholami, A., & Kuster, B. (2012) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.016675 · Cited by 94
“The application of VSN has previously been shown to be beneficial for MS-based quantification (27, 28).”
MethodGinno, P. A., Burger, L., Seebacher, J., Iesmantavicius, V., & Schübeler, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06007-5 · Cited by 91
In situ cell-type-specific cell-surface proteomic profiling in mice
Shuster, S. A., Li, J., Chon, U., Sinantha-Hu, M. C., Luginbuhl, D. J., Udeshi, N. D., Carey, D. K., Takeo, Y. H., Xie, Q., Xu, C., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.025 · Cited by 70
Yugandhar, K., Gupta, S., & Yu, H. (2019) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2019.05.007 · Cited by 51
“[88] have also been used for handling the problem of underestimation of protein fold change and high variation in protein abundance in samples.”
MethodForshed, J., Johansson, H. J., Pernemalm, M., Branca, R. M. M., Sandberg, A., & Lehtiö, J. (2011) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m111.010264 · Cited by 32
Characterization and multiplexed quantification of derivatized aminophospholipids
Nie, S., Fhaner, C. J., Liu, S., Peake, D., Kiyonami, R., Huang, Y., & Reid, G. E. (2015) · International Journal of Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2015.07.002 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Karp, N. A., Huber, W., Sadowski, P. G., Charles, P. D., Hester, S. V., & Lilley, K. S.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1885-1897
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1566054158
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.