Comprehensive Comparison of iTRAQ and Label-free LC-Based Quantitative Proteomics Approaches Using Two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Strains of Interest for Biofuels Engineering
Abstract
Comprehensive comparisons of quantitative proteomics techniques are rare in the literature, yet they are crucially important for optimal selection of approaches and methodologies that are ideal for a given proteomics initiative. In this study, two LC-based quantitative proteomics approaches--iTRAQ and label-free--were implemented using the LTQ-Orbitrap Velos platform. For this comparison, the model used was the total protein content from two Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains in the context of alternative biofuels production. The strain comparison includes sta6 (a starch-less mutant of cw15) that produces twice as many lipid bodies (LB) containing triacylglycerols (TAGs) as its parental strain cw15 (a cell wall-deficient C. reinhardtii strain) under nitrogen starvation. Internal standard addition was used to rigorously assess the quantitation accuracy and precision of each method. Results from iTRAQ-4plex labeling using HCD (higher energy collision-induced dissociation) fragmentation were compared to those obtained using a label-free approach based on the peak area of intact peptides and collision-induced dissociation. The accuracy and precision, number of identified/quantified proteins and statistically significant protein differences detected, as well as efficiency of these two quantitative proteomics methods were evaluated and compared. Four technical and three biological replicates of each strain were performed to assess both the technical and biological variation of both…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wang et al. (2012) label-free proteomics identified 896 proteins and quantified 329, while iTRAQ identified 639 proteins and quantified 124 in two C. reinhardtii strains.
“The label-free method identified 896 proteins and quantified 329, while iTRAQ identified 639 proteins and quantified 124, highlighting mechanisms driving lipid production in sta6.”
From Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Microalgae Biotechnology: Unlocking Sustainable Solutions for High-Value Compounds and Carbon Neutrality (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Storage of starch and lipids in microalgae: Biosynthesis and manipulation by nutrients
Ran, W., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Qi, M., Xiang, Q., Yao, C., Zhang, Y., & Lan, X. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121894 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationA multiregional proteomic survey of the postnatal human brain
Carlyle, B. C., Kitchen, R. R., Kanyo, J. E., Voss, E. Z., Pletikos, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Lam, T. T., Gerstein, M. B., Sestan, N., & Nairn, A. C. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0011-2 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Longworth, J., Wu, D., Huete-Ortega, M., Wright, P. C., & Vaidyanathan, S. (2016) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.015 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Shan, L., Zhao, W., & Lu, X. (2025) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md23050184 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, H., Alvarez, S., & Hicks, L. M.
- Affiliations
- Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, 975 North Warson Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63132, USA
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 487-501
- ISSN
- 1535-3893
- 1535-3907
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review