The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urine in Clinical Proteomics
Open accessAbstract
Urine has become one of the most attractive biofluids in clinical proteomics as it can be obtained non-invasively in large quantities and is stable compared with other biofluids. The urinary proteome has been studied by almost any proteomics technology, but mass spectrometry-based urinary protein and peptide profiling has emerged as most suitable for clinical application. After a period of descriptive urinary proteomics the field is moving out of the discovery phase into an era of validation of urinary biomarkers in larger prospective studies. Although mainly due to the site of production of urine, the majority of these studies apply to the kidney and the urinary tract, but recent data show that analysis of the urinary proteome can also be highly informative on non-urogenital diseases and used in their classification. Despite this progress in urinary biomarker discovery, the contribution of urinary proteomics to the understanding of the pathophysiology of disease upon analysis of the urinary proteome is still modest mainly because of problems associated to sequence identification of the biomarkers. Until now, research has focused on the highly abundant urinary proteins and peptides, but analysis of the less abundant and naturally existing urinary proteins and peptides still remains a challenge. In conclusion, urine has evolved as one of the most attractive body fluids in clinical proteomics with potentially a rapid application in the clinic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Anderson, N. L., & Anderson, N. G. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.r200007-mcp200 · Cited by 4,414
Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility
Rifai, N., Gillette, M. A., & Carr, S. A. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1235 · Cited by 1,867
Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures
Reiner, A., Yekutieli, D., & Benjamini, Y. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btf877 · Cited by 1,765
Renal and urinary proteomics: Current applications and challenges
Thongboonkerd, V., & Malasit, P. (2005) · PROTEOMICS · doi:10.1002/pmic.200401012 · Cited by 235 · cited 3×
“As the majority of the urinary proteins and peptides have been found to originate from the kidney and the urinary tract (3), most of the completed studies have focused on these organs and tissues.”
InfluentialPractical Points in Urinary Proteomics
Thongboonkerd, V. (2007) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr070328s · Cited by 208
Cited by
Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics
Zhang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Shan, B., Baek, M.-C., & Yates, J. R. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003533 · Cited by 1,491
Erdbrügger, U., Blijdorp, C. J., Bijnsdorp, I. V., Borràs, F. E., Burger, D., Bussolati, B., Byrd, J. B., Clayton, A., Dear, J. W., Falcón‐Pérez, J. M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12093 · Cited by 404
A mountable toilet system for personalized health monitoring via the analysis of excreta
Park, S.-M., Won, D. D., Lee, B. J., Escobedo, D., Esteva, A., Aalipour, A., Ge, T. J., Kim, J. H., Suh, S., Choi, E. H., et al. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-0534-9 · Cited by 175
Insights into predicting diabetic nephropathy using urinary biomarkers
Khan, N. U., Lin, J., Liu, X., Li, H., Lu, W., Zhong, Z., Zhang, H., Waqas, M., & Shen, L. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2020.140475 · Cited by 90
Developing proteomic biomarkers for bladder cancer: towards clinical application
Frantzi, M., Latosinska, A., Flühe, L., Hupe, M. C., Critselis, E., Kramer, M. W., Merseburger, A. S., Mischak, H., & Vlahou, A. (2015) · Nature Reviews Urology · doi:10.1038/nrurol.2015.100 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Decramer, S., de Peredo, A. G., Breuil, B., Mischak, H., Monsarrat, B., Bascands, J.-L., & Schanstra, J. P.
- Venue
- Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1850-1862
- ISSN
- 1535-9476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140617063
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urine in Clinical Proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1074/mcp.r800001-mcp200
- The paper
- Decramer, S., de Peredo, A. G., Breuil, B., Mischak, H., Monsarrat, B., Bascands, J.-L., & Schanstra, J. P. (2008). Urine in Clinical Proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.r800001-mcp200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.