The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1. Language Acquisition and linguistic theory
Abstract
Although the relevance of language-acquisition research to issues in linguistic theory has been recognized for some time, this is the first book to bring together contributions that focus entirely on the relationship between the two areas.In particular, it provides new data about child language that suggest ties between children's developing grammar and adult grammars, and proposes approaches to the study of child language that have testable hypotheses within a unified theoretical framework. Language-acquisition data are related to a wide variety of theoretical questions, including anaphoric interpretation, proposed universal constraints, the structure of the base, and structural analyses of complex sentences. In each case, links are established between children's developing grammars and the target adult grammar.Contents: Introduction, Thomas Roeper; Acquisition Markedness, and Phrase Structure, Edwin S. Williams; Lexical Approach to Language Acquisition, Thomas Roeper, Steven Lapointe, Janet Bing, Susan L. Tavakolian; The Acquisition of Structural Restrictions on Anaphora, Lawrence Solan; Constraints on Anaphora in Child Language: A Prediction for a Universal, Barbara Lust; Children's Interpretations of Sentences Containing Reciprocals, Edward H. Matthei; Children's Interpretation of Negation in Complex Sentences, Marianne Phinney; Children's Grammar of Complement-Subject Interpretation, Helen Goodluck; The Conjoined-Clause Analysis of Relative Clauses, Susan L. Tavakolian; 'Little Linguist' Model of Syntax Learning, Virginia Valian, Judith Winzemer, Anne Erreich. References, Index.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Language input and child syntax
Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00500-5 · Cited by 892
The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00032-3 · Cited by 677
Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory
Wexler, K., & Manzini, M. R. (1987) · Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3727-7_3 · Cited by 425
Explaining language universals
Newmeyer, F. J. (1990) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s002222670001450x · Cited by 356
A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses
Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0169 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Venue
- Language Acquisition and Language Disorders
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 1993-10-28
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0925-0123 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W657100418
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.74
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1. Language Acquisition and linguistic theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/lald.6.03lan
- The paper
- 1. Language Acquisition and linguistic theory. (1993). Language Acquisition and Language Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.6.03lan
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.