The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment
Abstract
This chapter discusses the link between working memory, phonological short-term memory and language aptitude and describes how these cognitive abilities influence second language-learning processes. I provide a critical review of the definitions and constructs of aptitude and elaborate on how phonological short-term and working memory and components of language aptitude might influence processes of language learning, such as noticing, encoding in long-term memory, proceduralization and automatization, and aid second language processing and production. The chapter also considers the stability of cognitive variables in the course of language learning and presents evidence that certain components of language aptitude are prone to change with intensive exposure to second/third languages.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ATI effects are to be expected.
“More recently, scholars have likewise pointed out that ATI effects are to be expected (Grañena, 2013c;Kormos, 2013;Wen et al., 2017).”
From The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction (2024) · cites this paper as Kormos, 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
The role of individual learner differences in explicit language instruction
Roehr‐Brackin, K., Baranowska, K., Pavlekovic, R., & Scheffler, P. (2024) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12963 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Kormos, J.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University
- Venue
- Language Learning & Language Teaching
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2013-03-29
- Pages
- 131-152
- ISSN
- 1569-9471
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review