The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction
Abstract
This volume contributes to the burgeoning field of research on stance by offering a variety of studies based in natural discourse. These collected papers explore the situated, pragmatic, and interactional character of stancetaking, and present new models and conceptions of stance to spark future research. Central to the volume is the claim that stancetaking encompasses five general principles: it involves physical, attitudinal and/or moral positioning; it is a public action; it is inherently dialogic, interactional, and sequential; it indexes broader sociocultural contexts; and it is consequential to the interactants. Each paper explores one or more of these dimensions of stance from perspectives including interactional linguistics and conversation analysis, corpus linguistics, language description, discourse analysis, and sociocultural linguistics. Research languages include conversational American English, colloquial Indonesian, and Finnish. The understanding of stance that emerges is heterogeneous and variegated, and always intertwined with the pragmatic and social aspects of human conduct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture
(2013) · Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture · doi:10.1075/dapsac · Cited by 294
Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions
MOORE, E., & PODESVA, R. (2009) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404509990224 · Cited by 288
The N Word: Its History and Use in the African American Community
Rahman, J. (2012) · Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.1177/0075424211414807 · Cited by 142
Exploring Valued Patterns of Stance in Upper-Level Student Writing in the Disciplines
Lancaster, Z. (2014) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088313515170 · Cited by 88
How to drop a name: Hybridity, purity, and the K-pop fan
Chun, E. W. (2017) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404516000828 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Venue
- Pragmatics & Beyond New Series
- Publisher
- John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Published
- 2007-10-25
- ISSN
- 0922-842X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W635061744
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.02
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1075/pbns.164
- The paper
- Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. (2007). Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.