Cited by 41Categorization, perception, and languageSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

“Linguistic Anchors in the Sea of Thought?”

Open access
Clark, Andy·1996·Pragmatics & Cognition

Abstract

Language, according to Jackendoff, is more than just an instrument of communication and cultural transmission. It is also a tool which helps us to think. It does so, he suggests, by expanding the range of our conscious contents and hence allowing processes of attention and reflection to focus on items (such as abstract concepts and steps in chains of reasoning) which would not otherwise be available for scrutiny. I applaud Jackendoff s basic vision, but raise some doubts concerning the argument. In particular, I wonder what it is about public language that uniquely fits it to play the functional role which Jackendoff isolates — why couldn't expression in a private inner code induce the same computational benefits? I suggest a weaker position in which the communicative role of public language moulds it into a suitably expressive resource, such that natural language emerges as the logically and technologically contingent filler of a functional role which could, in principle, be filled by other means. I also compare and contrast Jackendoff's position with some related ideas due to Daniel Dennett and others, concluding with a sketch of my own view of language as an external artifact whose computational properties complement those of the basic biological brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/pc.4.1.09cla

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [4]4. Changeux, J., & Connes, A. (trans. 1995). Conversations on Mind, Matter and Mathe- matics (M. Debevoise, Trans.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  2. [8]8. Clark, A. (to appear). Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. [13]13. Diaz, R., & Berk, L. (Ed.). (1992). Private Speech: From Social Interaction to Self- Regulation. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  4. [19]19. In D. Rumelhart & et. al. (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 216- 271). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, A.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Andy
Venue
Pragmatics & Cognition
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
93-103
ISSN
  • 0929-0907 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-9943
OpenAlex
W2045204641
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pragmatics & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • ERA (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
Jackendoff, language and thought, public language, Daniel Dennett, abstract concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review