Cited by 36Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Contributions of event-related potential research to issues in explicit and implicit second language acquisition

Morgan-Short, Kara, Faretta-Stutenberg, Mandy, Bartlett-Hsu, Laura·2015·Studies in Bilingualism

Abstract

This chapter discusses how event-related potential (ERP) methodology and research may contribute to the issue of explicit and implicit learning of second languages (L2s). To start, we provide a general introduction to ERPs and an overview of common language-related ERP components, including information about their identifying characteristics, the underlying processes that they are understood to reflect, and whether they reflect explicit or implicit processing and knowledge. After providing this overview of language-related ERPs, we briefly describe the general pattern of ERP components found for L2 processing. Next, we consider the potential contributions of ERPs to explicit and implicit issues in L2 acquisition, and review the L2 literature more precisely by considering the patterns of ERP effects elicited by more explicit and implicit learning conditions in both laboratory and natural settings. Finally, we offer conclusions about the contributions of current L2 ERP research to issues of implicit and explicit L2 acquisition and make suggestions as to future directions for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1075/sibil.48.15mor

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain-imaging techniques do not permit learners to engage in spontaneous interaction invoking different cognitive functions.

    “probably because brain-imaging technique (e.g.event-related potentials (ERPs), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)) does not permit learners to engage in spontaneous interaction invoking different cognitive functions (see Steinhauer 2014;Morgan-Short, Faretta-Stutenberg & Bartlett-Hsu 2015).”

    From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Morgan-Short, Faretta-Stutenberg & Bartlett-Hsu 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Bartlett-Hsu, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois at Chicago
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Studies in Bilingualism
Published
2015-09-04
Pages
349-384
ISSN
0928-1533 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2502069752
Cited by
36
References
128
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.64
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in bilingualism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
event-related potentials, second language acquisition, explicit learning, implicit learning, implicit language learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review