The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hemispheric Equivalence and Age-Related Differences in Judgments of Simultaneity to Somatosensory Stimuli
Abstract
Hemispheric asymmetries, interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT), and age-related differences in judgments of simultaneity to tactile stimulation were examined. Two mechanical stimulators were employed to: (1) Determine whether both cerebral hemispheres are equally capable of processing fine tactile temporal information; (2) determine whether there is an age-related differential hemispheric decline in judgments of simultaneity, and (3) determine if simultaneity thresholds for tactile stimuli increase with advanced age. Tactile simultaneity thresholds were measured by using a modified parameter estimation by sequential testing algorithm. Participants judged whether pairs of tactile stimulation to index and middle fingers were delivered simultaneously. Results of both bimanual and unimanual conditions supported a model of hemispheric equivalence in that both hemispheres were equally capable of making judgments of simultaneity to fine tactile stimuli. The results further suggested that the hemispheric equivalence for judgments of simultaneity remains stable across adulthood. However, IHTTs of older adults were more than double that of younger adults, indicating a significant decrease in the speed of neural conduction. As well, relative to younger adults, older adults had significantly higher simultaneity thresholds.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results reported here are consistent with evidence from investigations examining individuals with agenesis of the CC, pointing to the role that this structure plays in complex brain functions.”
From A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism (2009) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Several cognitive and social deficits observed in autism have also been described in individuals with agenesis of the CC, although not all individuals with these deficits meet full DSM-IV-TR criteria for autistic disorder.”
From A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism (2009) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agenesis of the corpus callosum: Genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity
Paul, L. K., Brown, W. S., Adolphs, R., Tyszka, J. M., Richards, L. J., Mukherjee, P., & Sherr, E. H. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2107 · Cited by 830
Diffusion tensor imaging in autism spectrum disorder: a review
Travers, B. G., Adluru, N., Ennis, C., Tromp, D. P. M., Destiche, D., Doran, S., Bigler, E. D., Lange, N., Lainhart, J. E., & Alexander, A. L. (2012) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1243 · Cited by 450
A Meta-Analysis of the Corpus Callosum in Autism
Frazier, T. W., & Hardan, A. Y. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.022 · Cited by 267
Paul, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11689-010-9059-y · Cited by 272
Haptic Augmented Reality: Taxonomy and an Example of Stiffness Modulation
Jeon, S., & Choi, S. (2009) · PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1162/pres.18.5.387 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, L. N., & Sainsbury, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 587-598
- ISSN
- 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
- 1380-3395
- 1744-411X
- OpenAlex
- W1989281078
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- interhemispheric transfer time, age differences, simultaneity judgment, tactile stimuli, somatosensory processing, aging, hemispheric lateralization
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Refractory Period, Psychological, Sensory Thresholds, Sex Factors, Time Perception, Touch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hemispheric Equivalence and Age-Related Differences in Judgments of Simultaneity to Somatosensory Stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;ft587
- The paper
- Brown, L. N., & Sainsbury, R. S. (2000). Hemispheric Equivalence and Age-Related Differences in Judgments of Simultaneity to Somatosensory Stimuli. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22%3A5%3B1-9%3Bft587