Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropsychological Performance in Patients With Depression is Associated With Clinical, Etiological and Genetic Risk Factors

Naismith, Sharon L., Hickie, Ian B., Turner, Keelin, Little, Craig L., Winter, Virginia, Ward, Philip B., Wilhelm, Kay, Mitchell, Philip, Parker, Gordon·2003·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

The present study explores neuropsychological functioning in patients with depression with reference to key clinical, etiological and genetic features. In comparison to healthy volunteers, patients with severe depression demonstrated poorer performance on all neuropsychological tests except for WAIS-R Vocabulary and a 64-item computerized version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. On average, patients exhibited significant impairments (greater than -2 standard deviation units) on tests of simple reaction time, Part B of the Trail Making Test and Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices. When performance decrements were analyzed with reference to key clinical features, patients with melancholia performed more poorly on WAIS-R Vocabulary, semantic fluency and choice reaction time than those with nonmelancholic depression. After controlling for age, those patients with late-onset depression (i.e., age of onset > or =50 years) exhibited poorer performance on a computerized version of the Tower of London test in comparison to those with an early onset. While there was no relationship between neuropsychological test scores and summed vascular risk factors or apolipoprotein E genotypes, presence of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation was associated with slowed reaction time. The differential relationships between clinical, etiological and genetic risks and neuropsychological performance supports the presence of unique pathophysiological mechanisms in distinct subgroups of patients. These findings underscore the need to consider subtypes when investigating neuropsychological deficits in patients with depression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1076/jcen.25.6.866.16472

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Naismith, S. L., Hickie, I. B., Turner, K., Little, C. L., Winter, V., Ward, P. B., Wilhelm, K., Mitchell, P., & Parker, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
2003-09
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
866-877
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 1380-3395
  • 1744-411X
OpenAlex
W1980953942
Cited by
170
References
2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological Performance in Patients With Depression is Associated With Clinical, Etiological and Genetic Risk Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1076/jcen.25.6.866.16472
The paper
Naismith, S. L., Hickie, I. B., Turner, K., Little, C. L., Winter, V., Ward, P. B., Wilhelm, K., Mitchell, P., & Parker, G. (2003). Neuropsychological Performance in Patients With Depression is Associated With Clinical, Etiological and Genetic Risk Factors. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.25.6.866.16472

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.