Cited by 619Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

The role of biodiversity for element cycling and trophic interactions: an experimental approach in a grassland community

Roscher, Christiane, Schumacher, Jens, Baade, Jussi, Wilcke, Wolfgang, Gleixner, Gerd, Weisser, Wolfgang W., Schmid, Bernhard, Schulze, Ernst-Detlef·2004·Basic and Applied Ecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1078/1439-1791-00216

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial physico-chemical properties varied across the field site and are considered in the block design of The Jena Experiment.

    “The initial physico-chemical properties, such as pH (7.1-8.4), soil organic carbon (5-33 g C kg 1 ), and soil nitrogen concentrations (1.0-2.7 g N kg 1 ), varied across the field site and are considered in the block design of The Jena Experiment 26 .”
  • The block effect, mainly accounting for differences in soil texture among the blocks, was included as a random factor and fitted first, followed by plant species richness and functional groups.

    “The 'block effect', mainly accounting for differences in soil texture among the blocks 26 , was included as random factor and fitted first, followed by plant species richness and functional groups.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roscher, C., Schumacher, J., Baade, J., Wilcke, W., Gleixner, G., Weisser, W. W., Schmid, B., & Schulze, E.-D.
Affiliations
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
  • Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Roscher, Christiane
Venue
Basic and Applied Ecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
107-121
ISSN
1439-1791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018328348
Cited by
619
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 23
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Basic and Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
biodiversity, element cycling, trophic interactions, plant diversity, herbivores, soil fauna, plant functional groups, dominance effects, species mixtures, nutrient cycling, grassland biodiversity experiment, plant-soil feedback, plant-herbivore interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review