The fate of transgenic DNA and newly expressed proteins
Abstract
Abstract This chapter summarizes the animal feeding studies published concerning the fate of GM feed DNA and proteins, together with the resulting significance and consequence of a potential GM transfer into animals and their secondary products and the correlating safety aspects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products.
“Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products (Einspanier, 2013).”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Einspanier, 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1
Van Eenennaam, A. L., & Young, A. E. (2014) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8124 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“Summary of Data on Recombinant DNA/protein in Milk, Meat, and Eggs from Animals Fed Genetically Engineered Feed Studies have concluded that animals do not digest transgenic and native plant DNA differently and that rDNA from GE crops has not been detected in animal products (Einspanier, 2013).”
BackgroundExposure of livestock to GM feeds: Detectability and measurement
Nadal, A., Giacomo, M. D., Einspanier, R., Kleter, G. A., Kok, E. J., McFarland, S. E., Onori, R., Paris, A., Toldrà, M., van Dijk, J. P., et al. (2017) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.032 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationFurgał-Dierżuk, I., Strzetelski, J., Twardowska, M., Kwiatek, K., & Mazur, M. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65649/2015 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“These results are in accordance with previous findings that also reported the absence of recombinant DNA and protein in milk cows (Phipps et al., 2003; Nemeth et al., 2004; Calsamiglia, et al., 2007; Guertler et al., 2009; Einspanier, 2013) and in milk goats (Rizzi et al.”
BackgroundResultCzerwinski, J., Bogacki, M., Jalali, B. M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65640/2015 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Einspanier (2013) showed that transgenic DNA and newly expressed proteins are degraded during digestion similarly to native plant DNA and protein.”
BackgroundFuture challenges feeding transgenic plants
Flachowsky, G., & Reuter, T. (2017) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2017.0114 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Smith, K. F., & SPANGENBERG, G. C. (2016) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy6040059 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“These data from milking trials are consistent with those from wide ranging reviews of animal production trials that have focused on meat producing animals [2,20] with the conclusion that there are no detectable or reliably quantifiable traces of GM feed components in eggs, meat, or milk [2,20].”
ResultCzerwinski, J., Słupecka‐Ziemilska, M., Woliński, J., Barszcz, M., Konieczka, P., & Smulikowska, S. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65641/2015 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“and are not transferred to broiler tissues (Świątkiewicz et al., 2010; Einspanier, 2013).”
BackgroundAssessing the fate of recombinant plant DNA in rabbit’s tissues fed genetically modified cotton
Shahıd, A. A., Salisu, I. B., Yaqoob, A., Rao, A. Q., Ullah, I., & Husnaın, T. (2019) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/jpn.13243 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flachowsky, G. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811519-0.00005-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Genetics and Breeding for Productivity Traits in Forage and Bioenergy Grasses
Forster, J. W., & Smith, K. F. (2017) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03842-543-4
- Authors
- Einspanier, R.
- Corresponding author
- Einspanier, R.
- ORCID
- Einspanier, R.
- Venue
- Animal nutrition with transgenic plants
- Publisher
- CABI
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 130-139
- OpenAlex
- W368429815
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CABI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- genetically modified feed, animal feeding studies, secondary products, food safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
