The pipeline of GM crops for improved animal feed: Challenges for commercial use
Abstract
Abstract This chapter discusses the quality traits of transgenic plants for animal nutrition, including low phytate content, amino acid content, improved digestibility and enhanced oil content, and the prospects they offer and the challenges that remain to be addressed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are numerous GE crops enhanced for animal nutrition in the research and development pipeline, with almost 100 events under research in many countries.
“There are numerous GE crops enhanced for animal nutrition in the research and development pipeline, with almost 100 events under research in many countries of the world (Tillie et al., 2013).”
From Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1 (2014) · cites this paper as Tillie et al., 2013
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations1
Van Eenennaam, A. L., & Young, A. E. (2014) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2014-8124 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Challenges for Plant Breeders from the View of Animal Nutrition
Flachowsky, G., & Meyer, U. (2015) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture5041252 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“A large number of newly bred plants (crops and vegetables) of the so-called “second generation” (plants with output traits or with substantial changes in composition) with specific benefits for the consumer and animals are being developed or are in development [113].”
BackgroundInfluentialAnimal nutrition with transgenic plants
(2013) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9781780641768.0000 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Future challenges feeding transgenic plants
Flachowsky, G., & Reuter, T. (2017) · Animal Frontiers · doi:10.2527/af.2017.0114 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flachowsky, G., & Meyer, U. (2015) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/65610/2015 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The objectives of these strategies comprise: • higher feed intake of animals (NRC, 1987; Forbes, 1995) to improve the ratio between energy/nutrient requirements for maintenance and animal yields (Part 1; Table 5) • higher digestibility of feed (Tillie et al., 2013) to make energy and nutrients more available from the…”
BackgroundContributions to a Sustainable Production of Food of Animal Origin
Flachowsky, G., von Soosten, D., & Meyer, U. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6647-4_12 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flachowsky, G. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811519-0.00005-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Climate Relevant Emissions from Animal Production and Reduction Potentials
Flachowsky, G., von Soosten, D., & Meyer, U. (2015) · Animal Review · doi:10.18488/journal.ar/2015.2.2/101.2.19.57 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Dänicke, S., & Flachowsky, G. (2015) · Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry · doi:10.1002/14356007.r10_r01
- Authors
- Tillie, P., Dillen, K., & Rodríguez-Cerezo, E.
- Affiliations
- European Commission (BE)
- Venue
- Animal nutrition with transgenic plants
- Publisher
- CABI
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 166-192
- OpenAlex
- W263750043
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CABI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Keywords
- genetically modified crops, animal feed, transgenic plants, phytate reduction, amino acid content, digestibility, oil content, commercialization challenges, feed quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
