Cited by 19Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesGeographies of human-animal interactions

Human contact.

Hemsworth, P. H., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J.·2018·Animal welfare

Abstract

Human-animal relationships are viewed in various ways, but from an ethological perspective they can be conceptualized in terms of inter-individual relationships. This chapter will review the influence of human contact on the welfare of domestic (farm and companion) animals and zoo animals. The model used will be the relationship between humans and farm animals, the subject of the majority of ethological and psychological studies on human-animal relationships. There are three main lines of evidence concerning the implications for the welfare of domestic (farm and companion) animals and zoo animals: handling studies in field settings; field observations on human-animal interactions; and intervention studies in field settings. Although handling at an early age may be highly influential, subsequent handling is also influential and has the potential to modify early learning effects. Conditioning and habituation to humans, occurring both early and later in life, are probably the most influential factors affecting the behavioural and physiological responses of these animals to humans. While there has been less research conducted on zoo animals, there is a developing scientific literature on the effects of humans, particularly zoo visitors, on zoo animals. Furthermore, there is an increasing interest in understanding the influence of the human-animal relationship on companion animal welfare, but there is little empirical evidence. This review highlights the important role and respons…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/9781786390202.0294

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behaviours such as huddling, vigilance and in particular avoidance are indicators of fear of humans in animals and linked with physiological correlates of fear such as increased blood glucocorticoid and glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations.

    “Behaviours such as huddling, vigilance and in particular avoidance, have been widely documented as indicators of fear of humans in animals and linked with physiological correlates of fear such as increased blood glucocorticoid and glucocorticoid metabolite (GM) concentrations (Gray 1987;Hemsworth and Coleman 2011;Hemsworth et al. 2018;Sherwen and Hemsworth 2019).”
  • Avoidance behaviours are an indicator of fear of humans in animals.

    “It is well established that avoidance behaviours are an indicator of fear of humans in animals (Hemsworth et al. 2018;Sherwen and Hemsworth 2019).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemsworth, P. H., Sherwen, S. L., & Coleman, G. J.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Animal welfare
Published
2018-01
Pages
294-314
OpenAlex
W4241303000
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
10.47
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CABI Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographies of human-animal interactions
Keywords
human-animal relations, livestock, zoo animals, companion animals, habituation, stress physiology, zoo visitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review