Cited by 198Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The potential of the human–animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals

Claxton, Anna M.·2011·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.03.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The model suggests that Human-Animal Relationships in zoos can be characterised as negative, neutral or positive.

    “This model suggests that HARs in zoos can be characterised in three ways: (i) a negative relationship, where the animal is highly fearful of humans and shows avoidance, (ii) a neutral relationship, if interactions with humans have no consequences for the animal and can lead to habituation to humans, or (iii) a positive relationship, where the animal will potentially experience positive emotions”
  • How an animal perceives human interactions is influenced by the nature of the interaction, previous experience with humans, temperament, motivational state, genetics and species.

    “How an animal perceives human interactions is not only influenced by the nature of the interaction but also by other variables, including previous experience with humans, temperament and motivational state, genetics and species [21,24,25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claxton, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Claxton, Anna M.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
133
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973160295
Cited by
198
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
FWCI
12.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Whitley Wildlife Conservation Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
human-animal relations, environmental enrichment, zoo animal welfare, captive animals, fear of humans, human contact, abnormal behaviour, natural behavior, husbandry, introduced species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review