Biopreservation of food and feed by postharvest biocontrol with microorganisms.
Abstract
This chapter provides a review of the use of natural antagonists for food preservation; the development and commercialization of biological control products and their mode of action; the integration of biocontrol approaches; the safety of biocontrol agents used as food; and barriers to commercialization of this approach.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For biocontrol yeasts studied in detail, multiple mechanisms such as competition for nutrients and space, secretion of enzymes, toxin production, release of VOCs, mycoparasitism and induction of resistance in plants are likely involved in antagonistic function.
“For the biocontrol yeasts so far studied in detail, multiple mechanisms such as competition for nutrients and space, secretion of enzymes, toxin production, release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), mycoparasitism and induction of resistance in plants are likely to be involved in the antagonistic function (Fig. 1) (Droby et al. 2009; Punja and Utkhede 2003; Wisniewski and Droby 2012).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Droby 2012
M. fructicola isolate NRRL Y-30752 was isolated and discovered in Israel and developed and registered as a biocontrol product for preventing postharvest diseases, particularly in sweet potato and carrot.
“Originally, M. fructicola, isolate NRRL Y-30752, was isolated and discovered in Israel and developed and registered as a biocontrol product for preventing postharvest diseases, particularly in sweet potato and carrot (Eshel et al. 2009; Kurtzman and Droby 2001; Wisniewski and Droby 2012).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Wisniewski and Droby 2012
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications
Freimoser, F. M., Rueda-Mejia, M. P., Tilocca, B., & Migheli, Q. (2019) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-019-2728-4 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Madbouly, A. K., Abo‐Elyousr, K. A. M., & Ismail, I. M. (2020) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104239 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Biological Control of Patulin by Antagonistic Yeast: A case study and possible model
Mahunu, G. K., Zhang, H., Yang, Q., Li, C., & Zheng, X. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/1040841x.2015.1009823 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Yeast as plant growth promoter and biocontrol agent
Kapoor, D., & Karnwal, A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821394-0.00017-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
(2021) · Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research · doi:10.36632/mejar/2021.10.2.46 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wisniewski, M., & Droby, S.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Venue
- Beneficial microorganisms in agriculture, food and the environment: safety assessment and regulation
- Publisher
- CABI
- Published
- 2012-01
- Pages
- 57-66
- OpenAlex
- W1457469590
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CABI eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- biopreservation, postharvest biocontrol, natural enemies, biological control products, food preservation, feed preservation, mechanism of action, commercialization barriers, microbial antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
