Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methane formation in faunated and ciliate-free cattle and its relationship with rumen volatile fatty acid proportions

Open access
Whitelaw, F. G., Eadie, J. Margaret, Bruce, L. A., Shand, W. J.·1984·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

1. Twelve steers fitted with rumen cannulas were used in three separate experiments to investigate the effects of the presence or absence of rumen ciliate protozoa on methane production. The diet consisted of 850 g barley and 150 g protein supplement/kg, and was given in three feeds daily at a restricted level of 61 g/kg live weight 0.75. Animals were defaunated initially by allowing ad lib. consumption of this diet and were then maintained ciliate-free by isolation or were faunated by inoculation with a mixed ciliate suspension. Samples of rumen fluid were taken routinely for the assessment of microbial populations and for volatile fatty acid (VFA) analysis and energy and nitrogen balances and digestibility measurements were made at intervals while animals were confined in respiration chambers. 2. In each experiment the rumen VFA proportions changed from a high-propionate pattern under ciliate-free conditions to a low-propionate, high-butyrate pattern in the presence of ciliates: differences between treatments were highly significant (P < 0.001). There were also marked differences between treatments in CH, production but a reliable comparison was possible only in Expt 3, in which CH 4 was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the presence of a rumen ciliate population. In Expt 3 the increased loss of energy as CH 4 in the faunated animals amounted to 44 MJ/100 MJ energy intake. 3. Stoichiometric estimates of CH 4 production derived from the observed VFA proportions showed good agreement with CH 4 production as measured in respiration chambers. On average, the stoichiometric CH 4 values overestimated CH 4 production by a factor of 1.08. 4. Highly significant linear relationships (P < 0.001) were observed between the molar proportion of each major VFA and the quantity of CH 4 produced: the proportion of propionic acid was inversely related to CH 4 and showed the lowest residual standard deviation of all the relationships examined. 5. The losses of energy in faeces and urine did not differ between treatments hence the increased loss of energy as CH 4 in the faunated animals resulted in a significant reduction in the metabolizability of the diet from 0.73 to 0.69 (P < 0.05). No significant differences were detected between treatments in heat production, apparent digestibility coefficients or N balance. 6. It is suggested that the rumen ciliates, by modifying the rumen VFA proportions, are directly responsible for the increased CH 4 production in faunated animals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn19840094

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Whitelaw, F. G., Eadie, J. M., Bruce, L. A., & Shand, W. J.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
1984-09
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
261-275
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2054683943
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methane formation in faunated and ciliate-free cattle and its relationship with rumen volatile fatty acid proportions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn19840094
The paper
Whitelaw, F. G., Eadie, J. M., Bruce, L. A., & Shand, W. J. (1984). Methane formation in faunated and ciliate-free cattle and its relationship with rumen volatile fatty acid proportions. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19840094

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.