Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prebiotic effects of biscuits containing partially hydrolysed guar gum and fructo-oligosaccharides – a human volunteer study

Open access
Tuohy, K. M., Kolida, S., Lustenberger, A. M., Gibson, G. R.·2001·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Prebiotics are non-digestible food ingredients that target selected groups of the human colonic microflora, thus having the ability to alter the composition towards a more ‘beneficial’ community, i.e. selectively increasing populations of bifidobacteria and/or lactobacilli. In the present study the prebiotic potential of partially hydrolysed guar gum (PHGG) and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) in a biscuit was assessed in human volunteers. Fluorescent in situ hybridization using oligonucleotide probes targeting Bacteroides spp.,Bifidobacterium spp.,Clostridium spp. and Lactobacillus–Enterococcus spp. were used for the bacteriology and total bacteria were enumerated using the fluorescent stain 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Thirty-one volunteers consumed daily either three experimental biscuits (providing a total (g/d) of 6·6 FOS and 3·4 PHGG) or three placebo biscuits for two 21-d crossover periods. Bifidobacteria significantly increased in number on ingestion of the experimental biscuits compared with pre-treatment and placebo population levels. Bifidobacterial numbers returned to pretreatment levels within 7 d of the cessation of intake of experimental biscuits. A correlation was observed between the initial faecal bifidobacterial numbers and the magnitude of bifidogenesis, with volunteers who possessed low initial population levels of bifidobacteria experiencing the greatest increase in bifidogenesis. No changes were observed in the other bacterial groups monitored during the trial. Thus, the prebiotic nature of FOS and PHGG was maintained in a final food product as evidenced from the selective increase in bifidobacterial numbers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn2001394

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Gibson, 1996, Gut Flora and Health – Past, Present and Future. International Congress and Symposium Series 219, 3
  2. Alam, 1997, Efficacy of a soluble fibre supplemented oral rehydration solution (ORS) in the treatment of acute diarrhoea in children, Gastroenterology, 112
  3. Conway, 1995, Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology and Pathology, 1
  4. 10.1097/00005176-199809000-00011 · doi:10.1097/00005176-199809000-00011 · Paper page
  5. Levitt, 1995, large intestine Human Colonic Bacteria: Role in Nutrition, Physiology and Pathology, 131
  6. 10.3402/mehd.v11i1.7876 · doi:10.3402/mehd.v11i1.7876 · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/978-2-8178-0922-9 · doi:10.1007/978-2-8178-0922-9

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Tuohy, K. M., Kolida, S., Lustenberger, A. M., & Gibson, G. R.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2001-09
Volume
86
Issue
3
Pages
341-348
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2137327380
Cited by
304
References
40
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prebiotic effects of biscuits containing partially hydrolysed guar gum and fructo-oligosaccharides – a human volunteer study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn2001394
The paper
Tuohy, K. M., Kolida, S., Lustenberger, A. M., & Gibson, G. R. (2001). The prebiotic effects of biscuits containing partially hydrolysed guar gum and fructo-oligosaccharides – a human volunteer study. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001394

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.