Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences

Open access
Perissinotto, Egle, Pisent, Claudia, Sergi, Giuseppe, Grigoletto, Francesco, Enzi, Giuliano, ILSA Working Group·2002·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

In clinical practice and epidemiological surveys, anthropometric measurements represent an important component of nutritional assessment in the elderly. The anthropometric standards derived from adult populations may not be appropriate for the elderly because of body composition changes occurring during ageing. Specific anthropometric reference data for the elderly are necessary. In the present study we investigated anthropometric characteristics and their relationship to gender and age in a cross-sectional sample of 3356 subjects, randomly selected from an elderly Italian population. In both sexes, weight and height significantly decreased with age while knee height did not. The BMI was significantly higher in women than in men (27·6 SD 5·7 V.26·4 sd 3·7;P<0·001) and it was lower in the oldest than in the youngest subjects (P<0·05) of both genders. The 75th year of age was a turning point for BMI as for other anthropometric measurements. According to BMI values, the prevalence of malnutrition was lower than 5 % in both genders, whereas obesity was shown to have a higher prevalence in women than in men (28 %v. 16 %;P<0·001). Waist circumference and waist : hip ratio values were higher for the youngest men than for the oldest men (P<0·05), whereas in women the waist : hip ratio values were higher in the oldest women, suggesting that visceral redistribution in old age predominantly affects females. In conclusion, in the elderly the oldest subjects showed a thinner body frame than the youngest of both genders, and there was a more marked fat redistribution in women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn2001487

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Perissinotto, E., Pisent, C., Sergi, G., Grigoletto, F., Enzi, G., & ILSA Working Group
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2002-02
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
177-186
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2109117024
Cited by
462
References
44
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1079/bjn2001487
The paper
Perissinotto, E., Pisent, C., Sergi, G., Grigoletto, F., Enzi, G., & ILSA Working Group. (2002). Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001487

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.