Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 637

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Age and gender differences in children's food preferences

Open access
Cooke, Lucy J., Wardle, Jane·2005·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The present study was conducted to examine the developmental patterning of food preferences in a large sample of British schoolchildren and to investigate possible gender differences. Using a cross-sectional survey design, the study was carried out in three primary and three secondary schools in West London, UK. A total of 1291 children aged from 4 to 16 years completed a 115-item food preference questionnaire in class time, supervised by class teachers and assistants. Children indicated whether they had ever tried each item and, if so, how much they liked it. We observed age-related increases in the number of foods tried (P<0·001), liked (P<0·005) and disliked (P<0·05). Controlling for the number of foods tried rendered the increase in dislikes non-significant and reversed the age effect on the number liked. Girls liked fruit (P<0·05) and vegetables (P<0·001) more than boys did; boys liked fatty and sugary foods (P<0·005), meat (P<0·001), processed meat products (P<0·001) and eggs (P<0·05) more than girls did. Some age differences were apparent in liking for categories of food, although the effects were not linear. Across ages and genders, children rated fatty and sugary foods most highly, although ratings for fruit were also high. Children's food preferences overall are not consistent with a healthy diet. Interventions should focus on increasing the familiarity, availability and accessibility of healthy foods and should be mindful of the need to target messages appropriately for boys who have less healthful food preferences than girls at all ages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/bjn20051389

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1006/appe.2001.0423 · DOI
  2. Ton Nu, 1996, Effects of age and gender on adolescents' food habits and preferences, Food Qual Prefer, 7, 251, 10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00023-7 · DOI
  3. Sweeting, 1994, Socio-demographic correlates of dietary habits in mid to late adolescence, Eur J Clin Nutr, 48, 736
  4. 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90349-4 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2004.21110.x · DOI
  6. 10.1080/07315724.1999.10718859 · DOI
  7. 10.1037/0278-6133.16.3.272 · DOI
  8. Peryam, 1963, The acceptance of novel foods, Food Technol, 17, 33
  9. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601814 · DOI
  10. 10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.222 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2001, Eat to live or live to eat? Do parents and children agree?, Public Health Nutr, 4, 141, 10.1079/PHN2000109 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/appe.1996.0009 · DOI
  13. Diehl, 1999, [Food preferences of 10- to 14-year-old boys and girls], Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 129, 151
  14. 10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80053-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0022-3182(79)80089-8 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1046/j.1365-277x.2000.00222.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60086-9 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0195-6663(95)99373-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/pmed.2001.0874 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/s002130050704 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80026-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1079/PHN2003527 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.237 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0195-6663(86)80002-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1006/appe.1998.0180 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.41 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Koivisto, 1997, Food and general neophobia and their relationship with self-reported food choice: familial resemblance in Swedish families with children of ages 7–17 years, Appetite, 29, 89, 10.1006/appe.1997.0108 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0022-3182(79)80025-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cooke, L. J., & Wardle, J.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2005-05
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
741-746
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2149770476
Cited by
637
References
0
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.