Cited by 70Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Familiarity with and affective responses to foods in 8–11-year-old children. The role of food neophobia and parental education

Mustonen, Sari, Oerlemans, Patty, Tuorila, Hely·2012·Appetite

Abstract

The present study investigated whether the familiarity with and affective responses to foods are predicted by the individual trait food neophobia and by parental education in school children. The cross-sectional data collection involved children (N=208, 8- and 11-year-old) from Helsinki, and their parents. A questionnaire assessing children's food neophobia with Food Neophobia Scale (FNS), and familiarity with and affective responses to 36 foods was completed by parents. Children with low FNS were familiar with a larger number of foods than those with high FNS. High FNS was associated with low pleasantness assessment of most food groups, including cheese, fruit/vegetables, fish, starch/cereals, and ethnic/exotic. Children of well educated parents had tasted a larger number of foods, thus displaying lower behavioral neophobia, and had lower FNS scores than children of less educated parents. Both low FNS scores and high parental education predicted the number of tasted foods. Parental education was not associated with pleasantness ratings (exception: cheese). To conclude, high food neophobia lowers the pleasantness ratings of foods, and parental education moderates behavioral neophobia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.027

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exposure effect could explain the finding that food-related mindfulness increased anticipated liking.

    “This finding could be explained by the exposure effect, which has been shown to positively impact on food neophobia (Mustonen, Oerlemans, & Tuorila, 2012; Nederkoorn et al., 2018).”

    From Children overcoming picky eating (COPE) - A cluster randomised controlled trial. (2020) · cites this paper as Mustonen, Oerlemans, & Tuorila, 2012

  • In young children, the bitter and undesirable taste of vegetables is often a major barrier to vegetable consumption, and food neophobia can interfere with young children's acceptance of vegetables.

    “In young children, the bitter and undesirable taste of vegetables is often provided as a major barrier to vegetable consumption [ 73 – 75 ], and food neophobia (the reluctance to eat, or the avoidance of, novel foods [ 76 ]) particularly, can interfere with young children’s acceptance of vegetables [ 76 – 78 ].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mustonen, S., Oerlemans, P., & Tuorila, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Mustonen, Sari
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
777-780
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130490292
Cited by
70
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
food neophobia, food familiarity, food pleasantness, parental education, children's food preferences, moderating effect
MeSH terms
Affect, Child, Child Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Educational Status, Female, Finland, Food Preferences, Happiness, Humans, Male, Parents, Personality, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, Recognition, Psychology, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review